Jerry Noe v. Melissa Noe (Barnes)
|
Cheatham | Court of Appeals | |
James Randall Slaughter, et al. v. Duck River Electric Membership Corporation, et al.
|
Maury | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Michael D. Wright
In this appeal, Defendant raises the following issues: (1) whether the trial court incorrectly applied two enhancement factors, thereby causing his sentences to be excessive, and (2) whether the trial court erred by ordering that certain of his sentences run consecutively. Following a thorough review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Darrell S. Miller
The appellant, Darrell S. Miller, was convicted by a jury in the Benton County Circuit Court of two counts of possessing controlled substances with intent to manufacture, sell, or deliver, and one count of possession of drug paraphernalia. The trial court sentenced the appellant to a total effective sentence of eight years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction, suspending all but one year and placing the appellant in a community corrections program for the remainder. On appeal, the appellant raises the following issues for our review: (1) whether the trial court properly admitted drug exhibits; (2) whether the trial court erred in permitting the testimony of Stacy Mumper regarding a prior transaction between the appellant and Mumper's companion; (3) whether the evidence was sufficient to sustain his convictions; (4) whether the trial court approved the verdict as thirteenth juror; and (5) whether the trial court erred in failing to grant a new trial when the appellant produced sworn affidavits that Brenda Wynn perjured herself on the witness stand. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Benton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Cox Oil vs. Lexington Beer Bd.
|
Henderson | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Jerry McPeak, IV
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Willie G. Lofton
Defendant, Willie G. Lofton, appeals his conviction for driving under the influence. Defendant claims that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury as to the offense of driving while impaired as a lesser included of driving under the influence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. James Brent Moubray
The Defendant was convicted by a jury of possessing a firearm where alcoholic beverages are served, a Class A misdemeanor, and the trial court sentenced him to eleven months and twenty-nine days to be served at seventy-five percent. The Defendant now appeals, arguing that the sentence imposed by the trial court was excessive. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Weakley | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Doug Jones vs. Eddie Gillette, Sr., et al
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Karen Mountjoy vs. City of Chattanooga
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Karen Mountjoy vs. City of Chattanooga
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Arfken & Associates, P.A. vs. Simpson Bridge Company, Inc.
|
Bradley | Court of Appeals | |
Arfken & Associates, P.A. vs. Simpson Bridge Company, Inc.
|
Bradley | Court of Appeals | |
M.P.P.,al vs. D.L.K. In Re: C.E.P.
|
Anderson | Court of Appeals | |
Walter Fletcher v. Deanna M. Fletcher,
|
Hawkins | Court of Appeals | |
Peggy Gaston vs. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Ins.
|
McMinn | Court of Appeals | |
Peggy Gaston vs. Tennessee Farmers Mutual Ins.
|
McMinn | Court of Appeals | |
City of Collegedale vs. Hamilton County Water Treatment
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Elizabeth Petty vs. State
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Jamie Mason vs. Charles Mason, Jr.
|
Cocke | Court of Appeals | |
2001-02185-COA-R3-CV
|
Roane | Court of Appeals | |
2000-02521-COA-R3-CV
|
Anderson | Court of Appeals | |
Services v. C.S.M. And L.M.M.
|
Union | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Antonio Dewayne Carpenter
The defendant, Antonio Dewayne Carpenter, was indicted for premeditated murder, felony murder, especially aggravated kidnapping, and especially aggravated robbery. The state filed notice seeking the death penalty. The defendant was convicted on each count of the indictment and the trial court merged the felony murder conviction with the premeditated murder conviction. At the conclusion of the penalty phase of the trial, the jury imposed a sentence of life without the possibility of parole. The trial court ordered concurrent twenty-year sentences for especially aggravated kidnapping and especially aggravated robbery. All of these sentences were ordered to be served consecutively to three life sentences for federal convictions stemming from the same incident. In this appeal of right, the defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and argues that the dual sovereignty doctrine, which permits successive federal and state prosecutions for the same acts, should be abandoned. The judgments are affirmed. |
Fayette | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Charles Damien Darden
|
Lake | Court of Criminal Appeals |