Robert Bean, Franklin Shaffer, David Autry, Mack Roberts, v. Ned Ray McWherter, Governor of the State of Tennessee, et al.
The appellants have asked the court to rehear this appeal because we did not address the facial conflict between the definitions of Class II and Class III wildlife, leaving the public without any guidance as to what species are in Class II. Since the possession of Class II wildlife without a permit is a crime, and no permit is required for the possession of those species in Class III, the determination of what is included in Class II is the critical determination. And a person of ordinary intelligence must be able to make it. State v. Thomas, 635 S.W.2d 114 (Tenn. 1982). |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Ferris E. Watson v. Lynn Rose Watson
This case involves a dispute over custody of two children upon their parents’ divorce. The trial court awarded custody to Lynn Rose Watson (“Mother”) with visitation to Ferris E. Watson (“Father”). Father appeals, claiming he is comparatively the better parent. We affirm the award of custody to Mother. |
Stewart | Court of Appeals | |
Gragg vs. Gragg
|
Supreme Court | ||
State vs. Daniel
|
Supreme Court | ||
State vs. Daniel
|
Supreme Court | ||
Gregory James Harper vs. State
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
E1999-02098-C)A-R3-CV
|
Hawkins | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-02550-COA-R3-CV
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance vs. Brian Howard, et al
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Danny Spradlin
|
Blount | Supreme Court | |
Rutherford Co. Bd. of Ed. vs. Rutherford Co. Comm.
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Brown vs. Wal-Mart
|
Lawrence | Supreme Court | |
03C01-9902-CC-00055
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Ricky Lee Turner
|
Rhea | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
William George Baltrip vs. Roy K. Norris, et al . Carolyn Turner vs. Monroe Farmers Cooperative
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Jeffrey L. Lawson v. University of Tennessee
We granted this Rule 9, T.R.A.P., application to determine whether the defendant University of Tennessee (“the University”) can be sued for a violation of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. We find that it cannot be sued for such violations under the current state of the law. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order denying the University’s motion to dismiss. |
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-02516-COA-R9-CV
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-02518-COA-R3-CV
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
E1998-00745-COA-R3-CV
|
Claiborne | Court of Appeals | |
02525-COA-R3-CV
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Rhonda Pritchett V.Brewer, Krause & Brooks & American Mining Insurance Co .
|
Davidson | Workers Compensation Panel | |
01C01-9808-CR-00325
|
Overton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
00747-COA-R3-CV
|
Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
03C01-9904-CC-00164
|
Bledsoe | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Opinion Believes It To Be. In State v. Green, 985 S.W.2D 591, 615-16 (Tenn. Crim. App.
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals |