State vs. Darren Parsons
02C01-9801-CC-00030
Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn

Roger Brown vs. City of Memphis
02A01-9803-CV-00069
Trial Court Judge: Robert A. Lanier

G. Winston Gragg vs. Nellie Gragg
02A01-9804-CV-00108
Trial Court Judge: Kay S. Robilio

Holifield vs. Campbell
01A01-9806-CH-00291
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle

Young vs. Young
01A01-9801-CH-00047
Trial Court Judge: John W. Rollins

State vs. Lisa Murphy
01C01-9708-CR-00355
Trial Court Judge: J. O. Bond

Ronald Thomas vs. State
01C01-9709-CR-00407
Trial Court Judge: Seth W. Norman

State vs. Timothy Henderson
01C01-9801-CC-00001

State vs. Harold Shaw
01C01-9707-CR-00259
Trial Court Judge: Seth W. Norman

Frederick B. Ingram v. William F. Earthman
01A01-9510-CH-00439
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Robert S. Brandt

This appeal involves a dispute between two former friends and business associates over a sizeable personal debt. After one of the friends failed to repay a $1,700,000 loan, the friend who had loaned the money filed suit in the Chancery Court for Davidson County seeking to recover the loan and interest. The borrower asserted that the lender had delayed too long in filing suit and counterclaimed for allegedly unpaid compensation and retirement benefits. A jury awarded the lender $5,667,122.84 on the debt, and the trial court, with the parties’ consent, awarded the lender an additional $400,000 for his legal expenses. On this appeal, the borrower raises numerous issues relating to the denial of his motions for directed verdict, the adequacy of the jury instructions, the instructions limiting the use of the evidence of the lender’s prior criminal conviction, and the excessiveness of the verdict. We have determined that the judgment should be affirmed.

Ford vs. Ford
01A01-9611-CV-00536
Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson

The Sherwin Williams Company, v. Ruth E. Johnson, Commissioner of Revenue, State of Tennessee
01A01-9711-CH-00651
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

Plaintiff Sherwin-Williams Company, filed suit pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated Section 67-1-1802 seeking a refund of corporate excise taxes with respect to tax years 1987, 1989, and 1990. The appeal presents three questions, to wit:

Lynn vs. Blue
01A01-9712-CH-00704
Trial Court Judge: Allen W. Wallace

Beal vs. Sloan
01A01-9801-CV-00024
Trial Court Judge: Barbara N. Haynes

Robbie Bickers v. Cigna Insurance Company
02S01-9710-CH-00097
Authoring Judge: F. Lloyd Tatum, Special Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. D. J. Alissandratos, Chancellor
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The complaint filed by the plaintiff, Robbie Bickers, alleges that on February 24, 1996 he was injured while employed for Parsec, Inc. at its Memphis, Tennessee rail yard. The complaint further charges that, as a result of the accident, he sustained injuries to his arms, chest, neck, and back. After considering the evidence, the chancellor found that the plaintiff failed to carry the burden of proof and rendered judgment in favor of the defendant, CIGNA Insurance Company, which is the workers' compensation carrier for the plaintiff's employer. In his only issue, the plaintiff states: Whether the proof supports a finding that the plaintiff suffered a compensable injury to his right wrist for which he retains permanent impairment. Since the issue presented to us questions only the action of the trial judge in failing to compensate plaintiff for permanent impairment to the right wrist, we will not elaborate in this opinion on the evidence concerning the other alleged injuries of the plaintiff. On February 24, 1996, plaintiff was operating a "yard mule," which is a half- truck. While removing heavy loads from a railcar, a container box separated from the frame, lifting plaintiff's truck-tractor rig off the ground and then slamming it back on the ground, allegedly injuring the plaintiff. The plaintiff was taken to the St. Joseph Hospital emergency room in Memphis and was treated briefly by Drs. Vernon Miller and Thomas Fowlkes. These doctors later referred the plaintiff to Dr. Mark Harriman, an orthopedic surgeon, who continued to treat the plaintiff. He was later examined by Dr. Joseph C. Boals, on two occasions. The plaintiff testified that because of his wrist injury, he had a lack of grip and "catching." He stated that due to this he could not use a hammer or turn wrenches. He also complained of difficulty with his back and shoulder. 2

Cherre Howard v. Granite State Ins. Co.
01S01-9708-CH-00179
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr., Special Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. Ellen Hobbs Lyle,
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The employer's insurer, Granite State Insurance Company, contends the chancellor erred in awarding permanent partial benefits based on sixty-five percent to the body as a whole. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed. Our review is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of correctness of the findings of fact, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann. section 5-6-225(e)(2). The extent of an injured worker's vocational disability is an issue of fact. Jaske v. Murray Ohio Mfg. Co., Inc., 75 S.W.2d 15 (Tenn. 1988). The employee or claimant, Cherre Howard, is sixty-four years old and has a high school education and experience in collections and clerical work. For the sixteen years preceding her injury, she worked as a collector for Professional Adjustment Service. On February 29, 1996, she fell down a flight of stairs while leaving work, dislocating her left shoulder. She later reported to the emergency room at Southern Hills Hospital, where a physician fractured both bones in her forearm, while unsuccessfully attempting to manipulate her shoulder into its socket. She subsequently saw another doctor at the same hospital, who twice performed open surgery to cure the injuries. The claimant returned to the operating doctor for follow-up care and he ultimately released her with an estimated eight percent permanent whole body impairment rating. However, the doctor concedes the claimant's condition worsened after he last saw her. When her condition worsened, she was referred to Dr. Allen Anderson, who assigned a permanent whole person impairment rating of nineteen percent and who restricted her from lifting more than ten pounds, from lifting any weight frequently and from pushing, pulling or climbing. The doctor diagnosed arthrofibrosis and a torn rotator cuff, which could not be repaired because of lack of bone. He testified the claimant could not use her injured arm. The chancellor, giving greater weight to Dr. Anderson's opinion, first awarded disability benefits based on seventy percent to the body as a whole, then reduced the award to one based on sixty-five percent to the body as a whole. The claimant has returned to work, but earns less than before the accident. The employer's insurer insists the chancellor erred in accepting the opinion of Dr. Anderson, who saw the claimant only once, instead of the opinion of the operating surgeon and because the claimant has been reasonably successful in her return to work. The employee insists the testimony of the operating surgeon can be discounted because her condition admittedly worsened 2

Rita Trull v. Kentucky Lake Oil Co.
02S01-9707-CV-00062
Authoring Judge: J. Steven Stafford, Special Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. C. Creed

Elizabeth A. Wilson v. Worthco, Inc., et al
02S01-9712-CH-00113
Authoring Judge: John K. Byers, Senior Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. William Michael Maloan,
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial judge found the plaintiff had suffered a compensable injury and entered a judgment in her favor of 5 percent vocational impairment to the body as a whole. The defendant raises the following issues: I. Whether the trial court erred in rejecting Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on grounds that the statute of limitations had expired prior to the filing of Plaintiff's claim. II. Whether the trial court erred in finding that Plaintiff's alleged injury was compensable and not a non-compensable aggravation of a pre-existing condition. III. Whether the trial court erred in finding that the Plaintiff sustained a fifty percent (5%) permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. Review of the findings of fact made by the trial court is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of the correctness of the findings, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(2); Stone v. City of McMinnville, 896 S.W.2d 548, 55 (Tenn. 1995). The application of this standard requires this Court to weigh in more depth the factual findings and conclusions of the trial court in a workers' compensation case. See Corcoran v. Foster Auto GMC, Inc., 746 S.W.2d 452, 456 (Tenn. 1988).

Mierzejewski vs. BS
03A01-9802-CH-00044

State vs. Paul Epps
02C01-9712-CC-00487
Trial Court Judge: Jon Kerry Blackwood

State vs. Wanda Harris
02C01-9803-CC-00087
Trial Court Judge: William B. Acree

State vs. Mickey White
02C01-9804-CC-00103
Trial Court Judge: Jon Kerry Blackwood

State vs. Shirley Double
01C01-9704-CR-00156

State vs. William Haithcote
01C01-9707-CC-00260
Trial Court Judge: William Charles Lee

State vs.Frank Hill
01C01-9708-CC-00344