Sarah May (Childers) (Harrison) Anderson, v. William Travis Harrison, Sr.
Plaintiff Sarah May Anderson appeals the trial court’s order enforcing the final divorce decree which was previously entered by the court in December 1981. The trial court enforced the decree’s provision relative to the division of the parties’ former marital home by requiring Defendant/Appellee William Travis Harrison, Sr., to pay to the Plaintiff the sum of $12,084.36 for her interest in the property. The trial court enforced the decree’s provision requiring the Defendant to pay a reasonable amount of child support to the Plaintiff by ordering the Defendant to pay to the Plaintiff the sum of $2250 for nine months of child support; however, the court ruledthat all other claims for child support were barred by the ten-year statute of limitations applicable to actions on judgments and decrees. Based on our conclusion that both of these rulings were in error, we modify in part, affirm in part, and reverse in part the trial court’s judgment. |
McNairy | Court of Appeals | |
Rita Jean Fisher, v. Lena Green and Gloria Smith
This is a nuisance action by one neighbor against another. The plaintiff alleged in her lawsuit that the defendant took action to cause flooding on the plaintiff’s property. The trial court found that the defendant had taken actions that resulted in flooding and enjoined further such actions, but found the evidence insufficient to award the plaintiff monetary damages for alleged damage to her home. The plaintiff appeals, and we affirm. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Andrea D. Bryant v. Phillip Wright, Jr. - Concurring
Defendant Phillip Wright, Jr. (“Wright” or” Appellant”) appeals the judgment of the trial court which awarded Plaintiff Andrea D. Bryant (“Bryant” or “Appellee”) the sum of $9,919.80 for breach of contract. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Mildred Johnson and Gary Johnson, v. Charles T. Cantrell and Patricia Cantrell
Plaintiffs Mildred and Gary Johnson appeal an order of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants Charles T. and Patricia Cantrell. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the trial court’s ruling. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Rodney Ford - Dissenting
I respectfully disagree with the majority’s conclusion that there was an illegal entry into the defendant’s home. Because I believe the entry into the residence and the seizure of property were proper, I further disagree that the matter should be remanded for further proceedings to determine the admissibility of the written confession. I would affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Florence Howard v. Jimmie Howard
Defendant Jimmie Howard (Husband) appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion to set aside the final divorce decree previously entered by the court. We affirm the trial court’s judgment based on our conclusion that the record contains insufficient evidence to support the Husband’s motion to set aside. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Hale v. Athens Stove Works
|
Knox | Workers Compensation Panel | |
Wayne Eldred Hill v. CNA Insurance and Larry Brinton, Jr. Director Chancellor of the Division of Worker's Compensation Fund, Tennessee Department of Labor
In this workers’ compensation action, the trial court determined that Wayne Eldred Hill, the employee, was permanently and totally disabled. Pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-208(a), the court apportioned 10 percent of the award to the employer and 90 percent of the award to the Second Injury Fund. The case was referred to the Special Workers’ Compensation Appeals Panel for findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-225(e). The Appeals Panel modified the award by apportioning 65 percent to the employer and 35 percent to the Second Injury Fund pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-208(b). |
Knox | Supreme Court | |
Wayne Eldred Hill v. CNA Insurance and Larry Brinton, Jr., Director of the Division of Workers Compensation, Tennessee Dept of Labor - Concurring
I concur in the majority's holding that this case falls within the purview of Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-208(a). I, however, continue to adhere to my dissent in Bomely v. Mid-America Corp., 970 S.W.2d 929 (Tenn. 1998), in which I concluded that Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-6-208(a) is applicable when there is a subsequent injury and the employee is rendered permanently and totally disabled. Subsection (b), however, should apply only when the employee is still able to earn a wage or be gainfully employed but has received compensable vocational disabilities that exceed 100 percent or 400 weeks of compensation |
Supreme Court | ||
Jean Dotson vs. Amanda Blake
|
Weakley | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Vickie Herron/Wanda Griffin
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Tony Young
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Annaco Inc. vs. John Corbin
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Bobby Rushing vs. Robert Daniel
|
Dyer | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Alberta Beard, et al
|
Fayette | Court of Appeals | |
William Winchester vs. Christy Little
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
William Winchester vs. Christy Little
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
Kenneth Culbert v. Carter County, Tennessee
The appellant, Mr. Kenneth Culbert, appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of Carter County granting Carter County’s motion to dismiss or for summary judgment of Mr. Culbert’s appeal of a decision of the Carter County Planning Commission by a writ of certiorari. |
Carter | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Isaiah Higgs
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9607-CC-00139
|
Lawrence | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9607-CC-00139
|
Lawrence | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Terry Smith
|
Cheatham | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Bruce Little vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Bruce Little vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
James Thomas Jefferson vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals |