Virginia Lynn Woolsey, v. Douglas Harmon McPherson
Plaintiff Virginia Lynn Woolsey appeals the trial court’s order removing Jennifer McPherson from her custody and placing the child in the custody of Defendant Douglas Harmon McPherson. McPherson appeals the trial court’s order requiring him to pay the $15,000 fee of the Guardian ad Litem. We affirm in all respects. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Phyllis Renee Brown, v. Charles Chandler Brown, Sr. - Concurring
I concur in the result reached by the majority opinion. However, I write separately to express my concern with the language on page 10 of that opinion which states that, “[i]n order to be compelling enough to warrant the dramatic remedy of changed custody, the change of circumstances must be such that ‘continuation of the adjudicated custody will substantially harm the child.’” I acknowledge that this language appears in Wall v. Wall, 907 S.W.2d 829, 834 (Tenn. App. 1995), an opinion of the middle section of this court. However, I further note that Wall cited Contreras v. Ward, 831 S.W.2d 288 (Tenn. App. 1991). Contreras was a parental relocation case which stated the long recognized rule that “the best interest and welfare of the child must be the primary focus of attention.” Contreras, 831 S.W.2d at 290. The court also cited with approval from Sartoph v. Sartoph, 354 A.2d 467, 473 (Md. Ct. Spec. App. 1976), wherein the Maryland Court of Special Appeals stated that “[t]he custody of children should not be disturbed unless there is some strong reason affecting the welfare of the child. To justify a change in custody, the change in conditions must have occurred which affects the welfare of the child and not that of the parents.” |
Court of Appeals | ||
State of Tennessee vs. Jacob Meeks
The defendant appeals from the dismissal of a petition for post-conviction relief, wherein he sought a delayed appeal from the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals, which affirmed his trial court conviction for “hindering a secured creditor,” to the Supreme Court. |
Fayette | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Kevin R. Wagner and Peggy A. Wagner, v. Tabor Construction, Inc. and John Tabor, D/B/A Tabor Construction Company
The facts of this case are relative (sic) simple. The plaintiffs contracted to purchase a house from the defendant. When the house was complete, excepting some "punch list items" the parties entered into a second contract. By the terms of the second contract, the defendant was to place $5,000.00 in escrow with the monies to be used toward the completion of the "punch list items. Part of the work was compleed on the "punch list" items. |
Court of Appeals | ||
Frizzell Construction, Inc., v. Gatlinburg, LLC.
The facts of this case, as material to this appeal, are relatively simple. The parties entered into a contract for the construction of a hotel in Gatlinburg, Tennessee. The contract was a standard 2 |
Sevier | Court of Appeals | |
Policeman's Benefit Assoc. of Nashvillevs. Nautilus Insurance Co.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Thomas Calvin Maney v. Tennessee Board of Paroles
A prisoner at the Lake County Regional Correctional Facility filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari in the Circuit Court of Davidson County, claiming that the Board of Paroles had acted illegally in revoking his parole, and in refusing to recondiser the revocation. The circuit court granted summary judgment to the Board of Paroles. We affirm. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Kennedy vs. Robson
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9711-PB-00656
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Thomas Davenport
|
Cannon | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Thomas Davenport
|
Cannon | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State v. Larry Morris
|
Franklin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Charles Madison Blackman, Jr.
|
Rutherford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Royce Lane
|
Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Michael Love
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Lescarbeau vs. Lescarbeau
|
Greene | Court of Appeals | |
Moore vs. Moore
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9712-CH-00535
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Caruthers vs. Caruthers
|
Cumberland | Court of Appeals | |
Fowler vs. Bowie
|
Washington | Court of Appeals | |
Pleasant vs. Repass
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Sanjines vs. Sanjines
|
Court of Appeals | ||
State vs. Woods
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Janet Arwood Sartain, et al vs. John Ross Sartain
|
Jefferson | Court of Appeals |