Opinions

01C01-9612-CR-00528
01C01-9612-CR-00528

State vs. William Watkins and Jonathan Davis
01C01-9701-CC-00004

State vs. Pendergrass
03C01-9608-CC-00310
Trial Court Judge: J. Curtis Smith

State vs. Pendergrass
03C01-9608-CC-00310
Trial Court Judge: J. Curtis Smith

State vs. Carlito Adams
02C01-9608-CR-00267
Trial Court Judge: Joseph B. Brown

State vs. Charles Vanderford
02C01-9609-CC-00307
Trial Court Judge: C. Creed Mcginley

Newton vs. Tinsley
03A01-9706-CV-00204
Trial Court Judge: Harold Wimberly

Robin vs. Seaton
03A01-9704-CH-00146
Trial Court Judge: Chester S. Rainwater

Terri Demilt vs. Methodist Hosp., et al
02A01-9611-CV-00283
Trial Court Judge: George H. Brown

Suzanne Gibson vs. James Prokell
02A01-9701-CH-00006
Trial Court Judge: C. Neal Small

Tennessee Municipal League vs. Brook Thompson
01S01-9711-CH-00242
The ruling listed above is the Order regarding the "Tiny Towns" legislation. The full opinion will be published at a later date.

State vs. Jose Holmes
02C01-9505-CR-00154

Sprinkle vs. State
03C01-9612-CR-00474
Trial Court Judge: James E. Beckner

Russell vs. State
03C01-9701-CR-00006
Trial Court Judge: Lynn W. Brown

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

McManamay vs. McManamay
01A01-9802-CH-00081

Keith Scarbrough vs. State
01C01-9607-CC-00322
Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Burch

State vs. Billy Rippy
01C01-9609-CR-00395
Trial Court Judge: Robert W. Wedemeyer

State vs. Bill Teal
01C01-9611-CC-00482
Trial Court Judge: Gerald L. Ewell, Sr.

State vs. John Knapp
02C01-9608-CR-00282
Trial Court Judge: W. Fred Axley

Watson vs. Ameredes
03A01-9704-CV-00129
Trial Court Judge: John B. Hagler, Jr.

Thurman vs. Thurman
03A01-9707-CH-00261

Oneida vs. Oneida
03A01-9707-CH-00264

03A01-9708-CH-
03A01-9708-CH-

Gloria E. Hill-Evans v. Bredell Michael Evans, Sr.
02A01-9607-CV-00157
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Judge George H. Brown, Jr.

In this divorce action brought by Gloria E. Hill-Evans (Mother) against Bredell Michael Evans, Sr. (Father), the trial court awarded custody of the parties’ two minor sons to Mother with Father to have reasonable visitation. However, the trial court’s decree further provided that visitation be suspended “until both of the parties and the children have completed a counseling program which is satisfactory to the court, and the court has been furnished a report that the counseling course has been successfully completed. When the counseling process has been successfully completed, the court will consider the defendant’s visitation rights.”