03C01-9606-CR-00236
03C01-9606-CR-00236

State vs. Vernon West & Derenzy Turner
02C01-9512-CR-00390
Trial Court Judge: Jon Kerry Blackwood

Henderson vs. Harlan, d/b/a: Lodge Quarters
01A01-9610-CV-00463
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz

Jammi vs. Conley
01A01-9609-CH-00425
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle

Bain vs. City of Murfreesboro
01A01-9611-CV-00510
Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Corlew, III

Wood vs. Prosser, et. al.
01A01-9510-CV-00468
Trial Court Judge: Marietta M. Shipley

Aghili vs. Saadatnejadi
01A01-9605-CV-00214
Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

03S01-9607-CV-00082
03S01-9607-CV-00082

State vs. Jimmy Robinson
02C01-9603-CC-00079

State vs. William Johnson
02C01-9605-CR-00136
Trial Court Judge: Carolyn Wade Blackett

State vs. Johnny Perry
02C01-9605-CR-00160
Trial Court Judge: L. Terry Lafferty

03C01-9603-CC-00099
03C01-9603-CC-00099
Trial Court Judge: R. Jerry Beck

Than Those Articulated By The Majority. The Majority Relies Upon State v. Marshall,
03C01-9602-CC-00066
Trial Court Judge: R. Steven Bebb

Than Those Articulated By The Majority. The Majority Relies Upon State v. Marshall,
03C01-9602-CC-00066
Trial Court Judge: R. Steven Bebb

03C01-9602-CC-00066
03C01-9602-CC-00066
Trial Court Judge: R. Steven Bebb

Glenda Whisenhunt vs. Gordon Whisenhunt
02A01-9506-CV-00126
Trial Court Judge: James E. Swearengen

David Dunnehew vs. Donna Dunnehew
02A01-9604-CH-00079

State vs. James Harvest
02C01-9506-CC-00167
Trial Court Judge: Jon Kerry Blackwood

State vs. James Harvest
02C01-9506-CC-00167
Trial Court Judge: Jon Kerry Blackwood

State vs. Freddie Mans
02C01-9605-CR-00147
Trial Court Judge: W. Fred Axley

Barry Wells vs. Ron Rickard
02C01-9610-CV-00358
Trial Court Judge: Joseph H. Walker, III

Pacific Properties, v. Home Federal Bank of Tennessee, v. Michael S. Stalcup
03A01-9701-CV-00020
Authoring Judge: Senior Judge William H. Inman
Trial Court Judge: Judge William R. Holt, Jr.

This action for conversion was submitted to a jury which returned a general verdict for the plaintiff, thereby implicitly finding that the fact-driven principal defense of the Statute of Limitations was not well-taken. Home Federal appeals and presents for review issues which, as paraphrased, question the propriety of the submission of the case to the jury, whether the defense of Statute of Limitations was well-taken, as a matter of law, whether requested jury instructions should have been given and whether the drawer of a check adequately instructed the drawee Bank as to its disposition. Pacific Properties

Barry Wells vs. Ron Rickard
02C01-9610-CV-00358
Trial Court Judge: Joseph H. Walker, III

State of Tennessee v. David Paul Martin
03S01-9604-CR-00040
Authoring Judge: Justice E. Riley Anderson
Trial Court Judge: Judge Richard Baumgardner

We granted review in this case to determine whether a court-ordered mental evaluation violated the defendant’s right against self-incrimination and the right to counsel under the United States and Tennessee Constitutions.