Michelle Lynn Durham and husband, Robert Wayne Durham, v. Luther Well an wife, Sue Well, individually and D/B/A Webb's British Petroleum Station and W. Paul Arnold, individually and D/B/A Arnold Construction Co.
Michelle Lynn Durham and Robert Wayne Durham (“plaintiffs” or by name)1 brought this suit in the Circuit Court of Gibson, County against Luther Webb and wife Sue Webb, individually and d/b/a Webb’s British Petroleum Station (“defendants”),2 seeking damages for defendant’s alleged negligence that caused plaintiff Michelle Durham to fall in defendant’s parking lot, causing injuries. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, from which this appeal is taken. The sole issue presented is whether the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We find no error and affirm. |
Gibson | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennesee v. Mario Lamont Wilson
A jury convicted defendant, Mario Lamont Wilson, of three counts of aggravated assault and of felony reckless endangerment and possession of a deadly weapon with the intent to commit a felony. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed Wilson’s felony reckless endangerment conviction and sentence, but reversed and dismissed the convictions for aggravated assault and possession of a deadly weapon. We granted permission to appeal to consider whether the Court of Criminal Appeals erred when it dismissed Wilson’s convictions for aggravated assault.1 Although we conclude that Wilson’s convictions for aggravated assault may not stand, we do not adopt entirely the reasoning of the Court of Criminal Appeals. Rather, we affirm the dismissal of the aggravated assault charges because the evidence is insufficient to prove that Wilson intentionally and knowingly caused another to reasonably fear imminent bodily injury. |
Madison | Supreme Court | |
Lillian D. Vega-Horta, et al., v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Company, et al.
Plaintiff, Lillian Vega-Horta (“plaintiff”), appeals the judgment of the trial court granting defendant’s, St. Mary’s Medical Center (“St. Mary’s”) Motion for Summary Judgment. For reasons state hereinafter, we affirm the trial court’s judgment. |
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9412-CV-00269
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9411-CV-00255
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9410-CH-00232
|
Dyer | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9505-CH-00218
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Vicky v. Klein
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9512-CH-00562
|
Warren | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9412-CV-00269
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Joseph Tipler
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9508-CC-00228
|
Claiborne | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9503-CR-00075
|
Greene | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03A01-9512-CV-00448
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Ester v. Hayes And
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9601-CH-00033
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9601-CV-00003
|
Court of Appeals | ||
The Recent Case of Gene v. Aaby v. Judy Aaby Strange, ____S.W.2D____,
|
Bradley | Court of Appeals | |
03C01-9507-CR-00206
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02A01-9411-CH-00261
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9411-CH-00262
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9511-CH-00258
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
03C01-9507-CR-00205
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9307-CR-00223
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9509-CC-00282
|
Greene | Court of Criminal Appeals |