02C01-9503-CC-00328
02C01-9503-CC-00328

Fayette Court of Criminal Appeals

02C01-9504-CC-00113
02C01-9504-CC-00113
Trial Court Judge: John Franklin Murchison

Henderson Court of Criminal Appeals

02C01-9501-CC-00008
02C01-9501-CC-00008
Trial Court Judge: C. Creed Mcginley

Hardin Court of Criminal Appeals

02C01-9412-CC-00295
02C01-9412-CC-00295

Dyer Court of Criminal Appeals

02C01-9502-CC-00042
02C01-9502-CC-00042
Trial Court Judge: Joseph H. Walker, III

Lauderdale Court of Criminal Appeals

02C01-9501-CC-00024
02C01-9501-CC-00024
Trial Court Judge: C. Creed Mcginley

Decatur Court of Criminal Appeals

02C01-9410-CR-00232
02C01-9410-CR-00232

Shelby Court of Criminal Appeals

02A01-9409-BC-00210
02A01-9409-BC-00210

Court of Appeals

03C01-9211-CR-00374
03C01-9211-CR-00374
Trial Court Judge: D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.

Blount Court of Criminal Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

03S01-9412-CR-00119
03S01-9412-CR-00119

Supreme Court

03C01-9410-CR-00388
03C01-9410-CR-00388

Cumberland Court of Criminal Appeals

03C01-9410-CR-00381
03C01-9410-CR-00381
Trial Court Judge: R. Jerry Beck

Washington Court of Criminal Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

03S01-9411-CV-00110
03S01-9411-CV-00110
Trial Court Judge: W. Dale Young

Supreme Court

State of Tennessee v. Mark Edward Taylor
E1999-01994-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: Richard R. Baumgartner

Knox Court of Criminal Appeals

Shoney's, Inc. and Shoney's of Canada, Inc., v. Chic Can Enterprises, LTD., an Alberta Corporation, Chic Can Enterprises, an Alberta LTD Ptrshp, et al.
01A01-9506-CH-00278
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Henry F. Todd
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Robert S. Brandt

The plaintiffs, Shoney's Inc., and Shoney's of Canada, Inc., have appealed from the judgment of the Trial Court dismissing their suit against the defendants, Chic Can Enterprises, Ltd., Little Caesars Pizza of Alberta, Inc., and Gen Group, Incorporated for lack of personal jurisdiction of said defendants.

Davidson Court of Appeals

Chrystyna Anisia (Czyz) Reymann, v. Vincent Robert Reymann
01A01-9506-CV-00272
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Henry F. Todd
Trial Court Judge: Judge W. Thomas Goodall, Jr.

This is an appeal from a decree of divorce in which the issues presented on appeal by defendant-appellant are:
I. The Trial Court erred in reducing valuation of the wife's civil service retirement pension by hypothetical social security benefits.
II. The Trial Court erred in awarding the parties' marital interest in annuities to their adult daughter in trust.
The plaintiff-appellee presents a third issue as follows:
III. The Trial Court erred in failing to adjust the distribution between husband and wife to equalize the tax effect on any unrealized gain on stocks.

Sumner Court of Appeals

Benny E. Shope and wife, Betty S. Shope, v. Radio Shack, a division of Tandy Corporation, and Radio Shack, Inc., a corporation doing business in Bradley County, Tennessee
03A01-9508-CV-00288
Authoring Judge: Judge Don T. McMurray
Trial Court Judge: Judge Earle G. Murphy

This is a premises liability action. The case was tried before a jury to the conclusion of the plaintiff's proof. At the conclusion of the plaintiff's proof, the defendants moved for a directed verdict which was granted. Judgment ws entered in favor of the defendants. This appeal resulted. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Court of Appeals

Benny R. Shope and wife, Betty S. Shope, v. Radio Shack, a division of Tandy Corporation, and Radio Shack, Inc. a corporation doing business in Bradley County, Tennessee
03A01-9508-CV-00288
Authoring Judge: Judge Don T. McMurray
Trial Court Judge: Judge Earle G. Murphy

This is a premises liability action. The case was tried before a jury to the conclusion of the plaintiffs' proof. At the conclusion of the plaintiffs' proof, the defendants moved for a directed verdict which was granted. Judgment was entered in favor of the defendants. This appeal resulted. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

 

Court of Appeals