W2002-01556-COA-R3-CV
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
W2002-01687-COA-R3-CV
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Edwin Boothe vs. Fred's Inc.
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Edwin Boothe vs. Fred's Inc.
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Union Planters Bank vs. Bobbye Shepard
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
W2002-00489-COA-R3-CV
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
W2002-01474-COA-R3-CV
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
W2002-03016-COA-R3-CV
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
W2002-02220-COA-R3-CV
|
Decatur | Court of Appeals | |
W2002-03050-COA-R3-CV
|
Gibson | Court of Appeals | |
The Oceanics Schools vs. Clifford Barbour, Jr.
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Amsouth Erectors, Llc v. Skaggs Iron Works, Inc.,
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Ann Wing v. Estate of James Wing
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Billy Culp v. Billie Grinder
|
Wayne | Court of Appeals | |
Shin Yi Lien v. Ruth Couch
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
State v. R.S. and K.S.
|
Franklin | Court of Appeals | |
Reta Tompkins v. Kevin Helton
|
Putnam | Court of Appeals | |
Elizabeth Snodgrass v. Allen Freemon
|
Lawrence | Court of Appeals | |
M2002-02603-COA-R3-JV
|
Lawrence | Court of Appeals | |
Evan Roberts vs. Miller Industries
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Royden Russell vs. Malvin L. Bray, et al.
Royden Russell and Judy Russell ("Plaintiffs") entered into a contract with Malvin L. Bray and Diedre Bray ("Sellers") to purchase a house. The sales contract required Plaintiffs to obtain an inspection by a professional home inspector. Plaintiffs hired Randall L. Douthat and Holly Douthat d/b/a The HomeTeam Inspection Service ("Defendants") to perform the home inspection. Royden Russell signed a form contract ("Contract") presented by Defendants. The Contract contained an exculpatory clause limiting Defendants' liability to the lesser of the cost of repair or the amount of the inspection fee. After moving into the house, Plaintiffs discovered structural problems. Plaintiffs sued Sellers, the realtors involved in the sale of the house, and Defendants. Plaintiffs filed a motion for partial summary judgment concerning the exculpatory clause contained in the Contract. Defendants responded by filing a Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment concerning, in part, the exculpatory clause. The Trial Court held the exculpatory clause was not against public policy and was enforceable. The Trial Court also granted Plaintiffs permission to file an interlocutory appeal. Plaintiffs applied to this Court and were granted an interlocutory appeal on the limited issue of whether the Trial Court erred in holding the exculpatory clause was not against public policy. We reverse. |
Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
Larry Benton v. Vanderbilt University
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Rodney Johnson v. James Gulley
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Nina Sue Holland v. City of Memphis,
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
W2002-02150-COA-R3-CV
|
Madison | Court of Appeals |