COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS | Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Sort by

Order

Nichols vs. Nichols 03A01-9810-CV-00352		Court of Appeals	07/29/99
03A01-9811-CH-000380 03A01-9811-CH-000380		Court of Appeals	07/29/99
Paula Marie Brown, v. James A. Brown - Concurring 03A01-9812-CV-00417 Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr. Trial Court Judge: Judge L. Marie Williams I concur i themajority opinion. I agree that the majority's approach to determining gross income for current child support is correct in this case. I write separately to express my view that the two-year-average approach utilized by the majority in this case may not be appropriate in all cases.	Hamilton	Court of Appeals	07/29/99
Byrd vs. Gibson 03A01-9901-CV-00022		Court of Appeals	07/29/99
Memphis Housing vs. Tara Thompson 02A01-9812-CV-00356 Trial Court Judge: Robert A. Lanier	Shelby	Court of Appeals	07/29/99
State/Carolyn Collier vs. Ephram Collier 02A01-9901-JV-00027 Trial Court Judge: J. Roland Reid	Haywood	Court of Appeals	07/29/99
03A01-9809-CV-00312 03A01-9809-CV-00312		Court of Appeals	07/28/99
Behm vs. Behm 03A01-9810-CH-00339	Loudon	Court of Appeals	07/28/99
Phung vs. Case 03A01-9811-CV-00388	Anderson	Court of Appeals	07/28/99
Phung vs. Case 03A01-9811-CV-00388	Anderson	Court of Appeals	07/28/99
Bok vs. State 03A01-9812-BC-00426		Court of Appeals	07/28/99
Brown vs. Brown 03A01-9812-CV-00417		Court of Appeals	07/28/99
Hart vs. Tourte 03A01-9901-CH-00004	Knox	Court of Appeals	07/28/99
Cannon vs. City of Chattanooga 03A01-9901-CV-00023	Hamilton	Court of Appeals	07/28/99
Howell vs. Howell 01A01-9806-CV-00301 Trial Court Judge: Lee Russell	Lincoln	Court of Appeals	07/27/99
Montgomery Co. vs. Nichols 01A01-9807-CV-00343 Trial Court Judge: James E. Walton	Montgomery	Court of Appeals	07/27/99
Lewis vs. Lewis 01A01-9809-CH-00469 Trial Court Judge: Carol A. Catalano	Montgomery	Court of Appeals	07/27/99
Richards vs. Read 01A01-9708-PB-00450		Court of Appeals	07/27/99
State, ex rel City of Lafayette vs. Mowell 01A01-9810-CV-00520 Trial Court Judge: Bobby H. Capers	Macon	Court of Appeals	07/27/99
Sears vs. Metro Nashville Airport 01A01-9703-CV-00138 Trial Court Judge: Thomas W. Brothers	Davidson	Court of Appeals	07/27/99
Oakley vs. Lang 01A01-9809-CH-00496 Trial Court Judge: Tom E. Gray	Sumner	Court of Appeals	07/27/99
Richards vs. Read 01A01-9708-PB-00450 Trial Court Judge: Frank G. Clement, Jr.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	07/27/99
Charles Conner vs. Cynthia Conner 02A01-9809-CH-00251 Trial Court Judge: D. J. Alissandratos	Shelby	Court of Appeals	07/27/99
James Mims vs. Pamela Mims W2001-01688-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers Trial Court Judge: Daniel L. Smith This appeal arises from a trial court's refusal to modify a custody agreement or increase child support obligations. A divorced father of three children petitioned the court to hold the mother in contempt and change the custody agreement embodied in a marital dissolution agreement from joint custody to primary or sole custody of the children by him. The mother counterpetitioned seeking to have the father held in contempt and to have child support increased. The trial court found that no material change in circumstances warranting a change in custody existed and refused to increase the father's child support obligations for lack of proof. For the following reasons, we affirm	Hardin	Court of Appeals	07/26/99
Joseph Beaucamp v. Board of Paroles, et al. M1998-00960-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr. Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle This appeal involves a dispute between a prisoner and the Tennessee Board of Paroles over the prisoner's right to sentence credits against his Tennessee conviction for time served in Arkansas penal institutions. After the Board declined to give him credit for this time, the prisoner filed a petition for common-law writ of certiorari in the Chancery Court for Davidson County asserting that the Board had acted illegally by refusing to abide by the terms of his Arkansas sentence. The trial court dismissed the petition, and the prisoner has appealed. We affirm the dismissal of the petition because Tennessee is not bound by the terms of the criminal sentences imposed by the courts of Arkansas.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	07/26/99