COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS | Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Sort by

Order

Cumberland Bend Investors vs. Ambrose Printing 01A01-9810-CH-00543 Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
Turner vs. Campbell 01A01-9903-CH-00139 Trial Court Judge: Stella L. Hargrove	Wayne	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
Taylor vs. Campbell 01A01-9812-CH-00638 Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy	Davidson	Court of Appeals	09/29/99
State vs. Fred W. Kincaid, Jr. 03C01-9707-CR-00306 Trial Court Judge: D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.	Blount	Court of Appeals	09/27/99
Zonge vs. Woodall M1998-00800-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell Trial Court Judge: Thomas W. Brothers Appellant, a pro se prisoner, brought this legal malpractice action against the appointed appellate counsel in his criminal case. Appellant argued that his conviction would have been reversed but for Appellee's failure to assert in his criminal appeal that the trial court committed reversible error by forcing Appellant to attend trial in prison garb. That argument was made in a supplemental brief filed by Appellant's new appellate counsel and was rejected by the Court of Criminal Appeals. The trial court in this malpractice action granted Appellee's motion for summary judgment. We affirm because Appellant has failed to establish a breach of the standard of care or that he was damaged by counsel's decision not to make an argument which was, in fact, made by new counsel and was unsuccessful.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	09/24/99
Sandusky vs. Sandusky 01A01-9808-CH-00416 Trial Court Judge: Patricia J. Cottrell	Wayne	Court of Appeals	09/22/99
01A01-9910-CH-00039 01A01-9910-CH-00039 Trial Court Judge: Patricia J. Cottrell	Davidson	Court of Appeals	09/22/99
Oaks vs. Oaks 01A01-9901-CH-00046 Trial Court Judge: Patricia J. Cottrell	Williamson	Court of Appeals	09/22/99
Letellier vs. Letellier 01A01-9903-JV-00157 Trial Court Judge: Betty Adams Green	Davidson	Court of Appeals	09/21/99
Buddy Lee Attractions, Inc. vs. William Morris Agency 01A01-9804-CH-00185		Court of Appeals	09/21/99
Lurie vs. Manning 01A01-9807-CV-00376 Trial Court Judge: Patricia J. Cottrell	Sumner	Court of Appeals	09/21/99
Buddy Lee Attractions, Inc. vs. William Morris Agency 01A01-9804-CH-00185 Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	09/21/99
Stewart vs. State 01A01-9810-BC-00557 Trial Court Judge: William B. Cain		Court of Appeals	09/21/99
Anthony Bryan Jennette, v. Teresa Lynn Jennette 01A01-9810-CH-00549 Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Ben H. Cantrell Trial Court Judge: Judge Robert E. Burch In this divorce case the husband appeals the trial court’s division of marital property and the order of child support. We affirm the trial court’s order.	Dickson	Court of Appeals	09/21/99
Northland Insurance Co. vs. State 01A01-9811-BC-00616 Trial Court Judge: William B. Cain	Davidson	Court of Appeals	09/21/99
Goad v. Simonton 03A01-9812-CV-00397	Scott	Court of Appeals	09/20/99
Jones vs. Pearl 01A01-9901-CV-00019 Trial Court Judge: Charles D. Haston, Sr.	Warren	Court of Appeals	09/17/99
Cashion vs. State 01A01-9903-BC-00174 Trial Court Judge: Inman		Court of Appeals	09/17/99
Reque vs. Monteagle Truck Plaza 01A01-9903-CV-00175	Franklin	Court of Appeals	09/17/99
Burrow vs. Barr 01A01-9806-CV-00311 Trial Court Judge: Thomas Goodall	Sumner	Court of Appeals	09/17/99
Reeves vs. Granite State Ins. Co. 01A01-9807-CH-00379	Grundy	Court of Appeals	09/17/99
Reeves vs. Granite State Ins. Co. 01A01-9807-CH-00379		Court of Appeals	09/17/99
The Honorable Hamilton v. Gayden, Judge 01A01-9809-CV-00492 Trial Court Judge: Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	09/17/99
Leroy Smith v. Ronald Gourley M2002-00044-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell Trial Court Judge: Tom E. Gray The Chancery Court of Sumner County denied enforcement of a lease with an option to purchase. On appeal the lessee argues that the chancellor erred in refusing to allow a copy of the lease/option to be introduced into evidence after he testified that the original had been lost. We find that the chancellor refused to allow the lease/option into evidence because of a lack of trustworthy proof regarding its execution. Therefore, we affirm.	Sumner	Court of Appeals	09/15/99
Department of Human Serv.: In the Matter of Kubra Satterfield 03A01-9810-JV-00341		Court of Appeals	09/15/99