0A01-9901-CH-00030
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Don Brunetti v. Board of Zoning Appeals of Williamson County, et al. - Concurring
This is an appeal of the trial court’s affirmance, in a writ of certiorari action, of a decision of the Williamson County Board of Zoning Appeals interpreting and applying provisions of the Williamson County Zoning Ordinance. The Appellant, Mr. Brunetti, is a neighbor of Mr. Brian Sanders, and objects to the operation of two grain bins (sometimes referred to as silos) on Mr. Sanders’s 5-acre parcel in Williamson County, which is zoned “Estate.” The Board of Zoning Appeals interpreted state statute and local ordinance to allow this “agricultural” use. We affirm. |
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Joanne Thompson Barrett v. Marilyn Young Hill - Concurring
This case involves a dispute between neighbors over a sewer line. The Defendant, Marilyn Hill, appeals the trial court’s finding of an easement by implication in favor of the Plaintiff, Joanne Barrett, across Ms. Hill’s property for the purpose of connecting Ms. Barrett’s property to the city sewer line. We affirm the trial court. |
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
William Jones v. Jeff Reynolds, Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Correction
Plaintiff William Jones appeals the trial court’s order granting the motion for summary judgment filed by the Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Correction in this dispute over the Department’s calculation of Jones’ sentence reduction credits. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Electric Controls, et al., v. Ponderosa Fibres of America, et al.
Defendant Vanderbilt Industrial Contracting Corporation (VICC) appeals the trial court’s judgments which awarded attorney’s fees to two of VICC’s co-defendants in this lawsuit, Kajima International, Inc., and Titan Contracting and Leasing Company. We reverse the trial court’s judgments based upon our conclusion that the relief awarded exceeds the scope of the relief requested by the parties’ pleadings. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Charles O. Mix and wife, Marilyn V. Mix, and Charles Alan Mix, v. Ray Miller and wife, Cleao Miller, Sandra Miller Scott, and Sherrell Mille Cole v. Ray Miller
The Mixes and the Millers are owners of adjacent pieces of real property. In this boundary line dispute, the trial court (1) determined the boundary line that divides the parties’ properties, (2) awarded damages to the Millers for certain timber that had been removed from the disputed property by the Mixes, (3) denied the parties’ motions to alter, modify, or amend its judgment or, in the alternative, for a new trial, (4) denied the Millers’ motion for discretionary costs, and (5) denied the Mixes’ motion to re-open the proof. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the cause for further proceedings consistent with this opinion |
Decatur | Court of Appeals | |
Catherine Edmundson v. Jimmy C.Grisham, d/b/a Germantown Pest Control, Germantown Termite & Pest Conrol, Inc., et al., - Concurring
Defendants Jimmy C. Grisham, d/b/a Germantown Pest Control, Germantown Termite and Pest Control, Inc., and Christopher D. Alexander appeal the trial court’s judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of Plaintiff/Appellee Catherine Edmundson in the amount of $50,000. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Steven Cobb v. Charles Wilson, et al.
Steven Cobb appeals from the dismissal of his pro se complaint against Charles Wilson, Evelyn Scallions, and Steve Vaughn. The complaint, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleged violations of Cobb’s rights under the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. |
Lauderdale | Court of Appeals | |
Kevin Kathleen Stacey v. Donald Ray Stacey
Donald Ray Stacey (Husband) appeals an order modifying the terms of the parties’ final decree of divorce. After almost twenty-eight years of marriage, the parties were divorced on July 6, 1995. The final decree was subsequently amended on July 14, 1995, to require Husband to pay attorney’s fees to Kevin Kathleen Stacey (Wife). Three children were born during the course of the marriage, but only one child, Zachary, was still a minor at the time of the couple’s divorce. Pursuant to the Amended Final Decree of Divorce (amended final decree), Wife was granted sole custody of the minor child with Husband having reasonable visitation. Husband was ordered to pay $1,300.00 in child support per month plus the Child Support Guidelines amount of 21% of his annual bonus up to a total gross income of $9,900.00 (bonus and base salary). |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee, ex rel, William L. Gibbons, v. Sherrod Jackson, Robert Williams, Nathaniel Williams, Mike Williams, Shirley Blalock, and Steven Craig Cooper
Sherrod Jackson, Robert Williams, Nathaniel Williams, Mike Williams, Shirley Blalock, and Steven Craig Cooper (collectively “Appellants”) appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County, which granted a temporary injunction, enjoining the Appellants from permitting “lap dancing” and from permitting employees or independent contractors from engaging in “lewd and obscene exhibition of genitals.” |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Town of Huntsville, Tennessee, a Municipal Corporation of the State of Tennessee, and Stanlodge, LLC., v. William I. Duncan, Richard Smith, Luke Coffey, James R. Potter
This litigation originated when the Town of Huntsville (“Huntsville”) and Stanlodge, LLC (“Stanlodge”), filed suit challenging the constitutionality of Chapter 1101 of the Public Acts of 1998. The plaintiffs specifically contest Section 9(f)(3)1 of Chapter 1101, which permits certain territoriesto hold incorporation elections even though these territories do not satisfy the minimum requirements for such elections as set forth in the general law. See T.C.A. § 6-1-201 (1998). On cross motions for summary judgment, the trial court granted summary judgment to the defendants, finding that Section 9(f)(3) is constitutional. Huntsville and Stanlodge appeal, raising five issues: |
Scott | Court of Appeals | |
Eldridge vs. Eldridge
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Lattimer vs. TDOC
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Wagner vs. Gaston
|
Sequatchie | Court of Appeals | |
In re: The Adoption of female child, E.N.R.
|
Lawrence | Court of Appeals | |
Hulshof vs. Hulshof
|
Marshall | Court of Appeals | |
Sherlock vs. Kwik Sak, et al
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Nickelson vs. Sumner Co. Bd. of Ed.
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Davis vs. Computer Maintenance Svc.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Eldridge vs. Eldridge
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Haywood vs. Haywood
|
Maury | Court of Appeals | |
Jo Ann Forman, Inc. et al vs. Nat'l Council on Compensation
|
Marion | Court of Appeals | |
Opryland Hotel vs. Millbrook Distribution Svcs.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Drake vs. Manson, et al
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9809-CH-00504
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals |
