United Steelworkers of America vs. Air Pollution Control Board
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Janet Arwood Sartain, et al vs. John Ross Sartain
|
Jefferson | Court of Appeals | |
Allen Lawrence vs. Town of Brighton
|
Tipton | Court of Appeals | |
Margaret Barnes vs. Bright Glade Home
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Becky Sanders vs. George Gray/John Curtis
|
Tipton | Court of Appeals | |
Lance vs. Lance
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Bob T. Souder v. Health Partners, Inc. - Concurring
This case involves a contract arbitration clause and the Tennessee Open Meetings Act (Act). Defendant, Health Partners, Inc. (HP), appeals the Chancellor’s order denying its motion to compel arbitration and granting the Plaintiff’s, Dr. Bob T. Souder, M.D. (Souder), motion for judgment on the pleadings. |
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
Smith vs. Kelley
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Griffin vs. Griffin
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9709-CH-00557
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Thompson vs. Thompson
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Loyal Featherstone Constru. vs. Robert Coleman
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Looper
|
Putnam | Court of Appeals | |
Ledford vs. Ledford
|
Lawrence | Court of Appeals | |
Hobbs vs. Hobbs
|
Sequatchie | Court of Appeals | |
Coker vs. State Claims Comm
|
Court of Appeals | ||
G. Winston Gragg vs. Nellie Gragg
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Roger Brown vs. City of Memphis
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Young vs. Young
|
Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
Ford vs. Ford
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Holifield vs. Campbell
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
The Sherwin Williams Company, v. Ruth E. Johnson, Commissioner of Revenue, State of Tennessee
Plaintiff Sherwin-Williams Company, filed suit pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated Section 67-1-1802 seeking a refund of corporate excise taxes with respect to tax years 1987, 1989, and 1990. The appeal presents three questions, to wit:
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Lynn vs. Blue
|
Humphreys | Court of Appeals | |
Beal vs. Sloan
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Frederick B. Ingram v. William F. Earthman
This appeal involves a dispute between two former friends and business associates over a sizeable personal debt. After one of the friends failed to repay a $1,700,000 loan, the friend who had loaned the money filed suit in the Chancery Court for Davidson County seeking to recover the loan and interest. The borrower asserted that the lender had delayed too long in filing suit and counterclaimed for allegedly unpaid compensation and retirement benefits. A jury awarded the lender $5,667,122.84 on the debt, and the trial court, with the parties’ consent, awarded the lender an additional $400,000 for his legal expenses. On this appeal, the borrower raises numerous issues relating to the denial of his motions for directed verdict, the adequacy of the jury instructions, the instructions limiting the use of the evidence of the lender’s prior criminal conviction, and the excessiveness of the verdict. We have determined that the judgment should be affirmed. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals |