Gregory Hill vs. City of Germantown, TN
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Lynn/Rhonda Harris vs. Susan Thurmond
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Randolph vs. Poteet
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Hensley vs. TDOC
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
John J. Villanueva, v. Tennessee Department of Correction
This appeal involves a state prisoner's challenge to his continued incarceration. The prisoner contends that he is entitled to the benefit of the 1989 Sentencing Reform Act’s allegedly lesser sentence for the crime of which he was convicted, rather than the life sentence imposed upon him as a habitual offender at the time of his conviction in 1987. The trial court granted the Department's Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing the prisoner's petition. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Coleman vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Randolph vs. Poteet
|
Putnam | Court of Appeals | |
In re: The Estate of Janet Gail Levine March, Absentee
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
03C01-9601-CC-00009
|
Washington | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Nathan Lee Colquit
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Knoble vs. Taylor
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Rogers vs. State
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Butler vs. Dept. of Correction
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Baldwin et al vs. Pirelli Armstrong et al
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Howse vs. State
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Griffin vs. Shelter Mutual Ins. Co.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9804-CV-00145
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9804-CV-00145
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Tn Farmers Mutual Ins. vs. Inman
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Sherer vs. Linginfelter
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Ellis vs. Trentham
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Stewart vs. Stewart
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Michelle Ball for herself and next of kind of Miranda K. Ball, Deceased, v. Hamilton County Emergency Medical Services
This civil action was filed by Michelle Ball ("Ms Ball") against Hamilton County Emergency Medical Services ("HCEMS") and others, seeking damages for the wrongful death of Ms. Ball's 16-month-old daughter, Miranda K. Ball ("Miranda"). The suit against HCEMS brought into play the provision of the Govermental Tort Liability Act. Following a bench trial, the court dismissed the complaint as to HCEMS, finding that HCEMS did not have a duty to transport Miranda to the hospital in the face of her mother's decision at the child's condition was not such as to require a trip to the hospital. The court further fond that HCEMS' emergency medical technicians ("the EMTS") did not violate their standard of care by failing to advise Ms. Ball that croup could be life-threatening under certain circumstances. Ms. Ball appealed, raising issues that present the following questions for our determination: |
Court of Appeals | ||
Howell vs. Chase
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Robert D. Fulcher, III and wife, Eleanor Fulcher and Allen-Fulcher Partnership, v. R. Chancellor Allen and H. Stanley Allen, Trustee, and Harwell-Allen Partnership
This appeal involves a dispute between partners. Plaintiffs-Appellants, Robert D. Fulcher III, Eleanor Fulcher, and Allen-Fulcher Partnership, appeal the trial court’s ruling in favor of Appellees, R. Chancellor Allen, H. Stanley Allen, and Harwell-Allen Partnership. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals |