COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OPINIONS

03C01-9601-CC-00016
03C01-9601-CC-00016
Trial Court Judge: E. Eugene Eblen

Roane Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. Theodore Howard
02C01-9508-CR-00237

Shelby Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. Terry Logan
02C01-9609-CC-00297

Fayette Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. James Gray
02C01-9601-CC-00035
Trial Court Judge: Whit A. Lafon

Madison Court of Criminal Appeals

State of Tennessee v. George Glenn Faulkner
01C01-9812-CR-00488
Trial Court Judge: Leon C. Burns, Jr.

Putnam Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. Matthew King
02C01-9607-CC-00237
Trial Court Judge: Dick Jerman, Jr.

Gibson Court of Criminal Appeals

State vs. Mirack Smith
W1999-01566-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Trial Court Judge: Carolyn Wade Blackett

Shelby Court of Criminal Appeals

03C01-9602-CC-00079
03C01-9602-CC-00079
Trial Court Judge: D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.

Blount Court of Criminal Appeals

03C01-9512-CC-00405
03C01-9512-CC-00405

Roane Court of Criminal Appeals

03C01-9508-CC-00247
03C01-9508-CC-00247
Trial Court Judge: Frank L. Slaughter

Sullivan Court of Criminal Appeals

03C01-9601-CR-00019
03C01-9601-CR-00019

Knox Court of Criminal Appeals

Anthony Williams vs Bill Compton, Warden
02C01-9612-CC-00469

This matter is before the Court upon the state’s motion to affirm the judgment of the trial court under Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. The case before this Court represents an appeal from the trial court’s denial of the petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus. The record was filed on December 17, 1996, and the petitioner’s brief was filed on February 7, 1997. The petitioner was originally indicted for aggravated rape in February 1987, and the petitioner was subsequently convicted of the same. In the present appeal, the petitioner, relying in part upon State v. Roger Dale Hill, No. 01C01-9508-CC-00267 (Tenn. Crim. App. June 20, 1996), contends the judgment entered against him is void because the indictment failed to allege the mens rea of the offense charged.

Lake Court of Criminal Appeals

Phillip Mark Nunley v. State of Tennessee
01C01-9602-CC-00066
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry L. Smith
Trial Court Judge: Judge Buddy D. Perry

Appellant Philip Mark Nunley appeals from the dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. On March 23, 1993, Appellant pled guilty to seconddegree murder and especially aggravated robbery. Appellant received a sentence of twenty-five years imprisonment for second-degree murder and twenty years imprisonment for especially aggravated robbery. The sentences were ordered to be served concurrently for an effective sentence of twenty-five years. On July 10, 1993, Appellant filed a petition for post-conviction relief, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel and that he involuntarily entered his guilty plea. The post-conviction court dismissed his petition, finding Appellant’s petition without merit. On appeal, Appellant argues that his guilty plea was involuntarily entered. For the reasons discussed below, we reject Appellant’s claim and affirm the decision of the post-conviction court.

Grundy Court of Criminal Appeals

State of Tennessee vs. Billy Joe Baggett
01C01-9604-CC-00160
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Trial Court Judge: Judge Robert E. Burch

The appellant, Billy Joe Baggett, was convicted by a jury of aggravated burglary. The trial court sentenced him to fifteen (15) years as a Range III, Persistent Offender. On appeal, he presents ten (10) issues for our review: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support a finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt for aggravated burglary; (2) whether the trial court erred in allowing the state to introduce tape recordings of four (4) telephone conversations between Baggett and a state informant; (3) whether the trial court erred in allowing the state to introduce a prybar into evidence; (4) whether the trial court erred in allowing the state to use prior convictions for impeachment purposes; (5) whether the trial court erred in allowing the state to present evidence of Baggett’s escape from jail; (6) whether the trial court erred in not granting a mistrial following a state witness’ prejudicial remarks; (7) whether the trial court erred in allowing evidence of Baggett’s preferential treatment while in jail; (8) whether the charge to the jury as to reasonable doubt was unconstitutional; (9) whether the trial court erred in sentencing Baggett; and (10)  whether the delay in hearing the motion for new trial violated his right to a speedy appeal. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Dickson Court of Criminal Appeals

02C01-9508-CR-00224
02C01-9508-CR-00224

Shelby Court of Criminal Appeals

02C01-9603-CR-00103
02C01-9603-CR-00103

Shelby Court of Criminal Appeals

02C01-9603-CC-00090
02C01-9603-CC-00090

Madison Court of Criminal Appeals

Hon. Wil v. Doran,
02C01-9603-CC-00093

Gibson Court of Criminal Appeals

02C01-9603-CR-00070
02C01-9603-CR-00070

Shelby Court of Criminal Appeals

02C01-9512-CR-00386
02C01-9512-CR-00386

Shelby Court of Criminal Appeals

02C01-9601-CC-00006
02C01-9601-CC-00006
Trial Court Judge: Joe G. Riley. Jr.

Dyer Court of Criminal Appeals

02C01-9510-CR-00330
02C01-9510-CR-00330

Shelby Court of Criminal Appeals

James v. Ball
02C01-9111-CR-00237
Trial Court Judge: L. Terry Lafferty

Shelby Court of Criminal Appeals

01C01-9701-CH-00025
01C01-9701-CH-00025

Davidson Court of Criminal Appeals

01C01-9509-CR-00309
01C01-9509-CR-00309
Trial Court Judge: Jane W. Wheatcraft

Sumner Court of Criminal Appeals