02C01-9412-CR-00293
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9506-CC-00161
|
Hardin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9505-CC-00152
|
Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9505-CC-00150
|
Henry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9412-CC-00269
|
Henry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9508-CR-00219
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9503-CR-00104
|
Campbell | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9312-CR-00407
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9504-CR-00122
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9408-CR-00298
|
Monroe | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9308-CR-00276
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9410-CC-00355
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9503-CC-00086
|
Bedford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9506-CC-00175
|
Hickman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9501-CR-00020
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9412-CR-00434
|
Macon | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9501-CC-00021
|
Bedford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9503-CR-00052
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9505-CC-00133
|
Coffee | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9506-CR-00185
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9504-CC-00115
|
Court of Criminal Appeals | ||
03C01-9405-CR-00188
|
Cocke | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9406-CR-00226
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9403-CR-00094
|
Cumberland | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Thomas Hebron v. State of Tennessee
The appellant, Thomas Hebron, appeals the dismissal by the trial court of his “Petition for Habeas Corpus/Petition for Post-Conviction Relief.” The appellant is currently serving a sentence of life imprisonment pursuant to a conviction on August 24, 1984, for first degree murder. On November 21, 1985, this court affirmed his conviction. State v. Hebron, No, 84-231-III (Tenn. Crim. App. at Nashville), perm. to appeal denied, (Tenn. 1986). In 1987, the appellant unsuccessfully sought federal habeas corpus relief. Subsequently, on March 6, 1989, he filed his first petition for post-conviction relief, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel. Following appointment of counsel and an evidentiary hearing, the trial court dismissed the petition. Finally, on February 22, 1994, the appellant filed the instant pro se petition, alleging an erroneous jury instruction on premeditation and deliberation, in violation of the supreme court’s opinion in State v. Brown, 836 S.W.2d 530 (Tenn. 1992). On March 15, 1994, the trial court appointed counsel to represent the appellant and, on May 18, 1995, conducted a hearing. At the hearing, the trial court treated the petition as one seeking post-conviction relief. Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-108 (1990). The trial court then concluded that the petition was barred by the applicable statute of limitations, Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-102 (1990), and, moreover, failed to state a ground for relief of constitutional magnitude, Tenn. Code Ann. § 40-30-105 (1990).
|
Hickman | Court of Criminal Appeals |