Henry vs. Metro Gov't
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Collins vs. Willis
|
Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Robert D. Merritt, Jr.
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Edward C. Coker vs. State
|
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Derrick Sawyers vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Glenna Kidd
|
Wilson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. George Redd
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Ricky Crawford
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Ricky Crawford
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Edward Drummer
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Larry Sneed vs. State
|
Maury | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Venson Terrell Taylor
|
Robertson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Donnie Sisk
|
Franklin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Kelly A. Hancock
|
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Charles Justin Osborne
|
Perry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Greg L. Baine vs. State
|
Polk | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. William B. Thurbley
|
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Robert Belch vs. Delisa Alsup
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
Charles Belk vs. Obion Co.
|
Obion | Court of Appeals | |
The Realty Shop vs. RR Westminster Holding
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. William Cox vs. A.C. Gilless
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Galmore
|
Shelby | Supreme Court | |
Gordon Peters vs. Sharon Peters
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
Quality First Staffing Services, v. Chase-Cavett Services, Inc., and Personnel Plus, Inc.
James Richardson (“Richardson”) and James Taylor (“Taylor”), officers and agents 1It is not nec essary tha t the perso n who is c harged with conte mpt b e a party to the underlying proceeding. Tennessee Code Annotated §29-9-102(3) states that a court can inflict punishments for contempts of court for “the willful disobedience or resistance of an y officer of the said courts, party, juror, witness, or any other person to any lawful writ, pro cess, o rder, rule, de cree, or command of sa id courts .” (em phasis added). It is also not necessary that the proceedings out of which the contempt arose be complete. A judgment of contempt fixing punishment is a final judgment from w hich app eal will lie. Hall v . Hall, 772 S.W.2d 432, (Tenn.App. 1989 ); Rules App.Proc., Rule 3(a). 2 of Personnel Plus, Inc. (“Personnel”) appeal the ruling of the trial court holding them in contempt for failure to pay Sixty Seven Thousand Dollars ($67,000.00) owed by Personnel to Quality First Staffing Services (“Quality”) into the Registry of the Chancery Clerk. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals |