Dept of Children's Services vs. NFGWP, in re:KSG and AlW
|
Scott | Court of Appeals | |
Richard Taylor vs Steven Burleson
|
Washington | Court of Appeals | |
Dairy Gold vs. Michael Thomas
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Kasiea Chance vs. Carl Gibson
|
Sevier | Court of Appeals | |
Jonathan H. vs. James Stewart
|
Anderson | Court of Appeals | |
Darin Montgomery v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
|
Montgomery | Workers Compensation Panel | |
State of Tennessee v. Rhynuia Lamont Barnes
The defendant was convicted of premeditated first degree murder by a Davidson County jury and sentenced to life imprisonment with the possibility of parole. In this appeal, he contends (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction; (2) he was denied the opportunity to retain his counsel of choice; (3) the state committed prosecutorial misconduct when it failed to sua sponte redact a portion of an audio tape, and the trial court improperly denied the defendant's request for a mistrial; and (4) the trial court erred when it failed to instruct the jury on facilitation of first degree murder and voluntary manslaughter as lesser-included offenses of first degree murder. After reviewing the record, we affirm. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Wendell Gary Gibson
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in ordering the defendant to pay $18,000 in restitution. We reverse the judgment of the trial court regarding restitution and remand this matter for further proceedings. |
Maury | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Guy R. Jenkins, et al vs. Dan Gibbs
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Donald Tangwall vs. Patrick Stapleton
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
Mary Trew, d/b/a Trew's Wrecker vs. David Haggard
|
Roane | Court of Appeals | |
Kelly Dean and Lara Lynn Brisco vs. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
|
Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
John Doe v. Commissioner George W. Hattaway of The
|
Claiborne | Court of Appeals | |
Glenn Edwin Bilyeu v. Sherwin Williams Company
|
Robertson | Workers Compensation Panel | |
Charles Thomas Huff v. Savage Zinc, Inc (Now Known As
|
Montgomery | Workers Compensation Panel | |
The Evidence Is Otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann._ 50-6-225(E)(2). Stone v. City of Mcminnville, 896
|
Knox | Workers Compensation Panel | |
Jerry Walker v. Ricky White
|
Macon | Court of Appeals | |
Carolyn Jones v. TennCare
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Antonio Rico Walls
The defendant, Antonio Rico Walls, was convicted of the sale of over .5 grams of cocaine within 1000 feet of a school, in violation of the Drug-Free School Zone Act, and appealed the conviction. Subsequently, he pled guilty to three additional counts of the indictment alleging the same offense, and was sentenced to concurrent fifteen-year sentences for each offense. The pleas of guilty purported to reserve, as a certified question, the claim that the Drug-Free School Zone Act is unconstitutional. We conclude that it is not, and, further, that the evidence at the defendant's trial was sufficient to support his conviction. Accordingly, we affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Montgomery | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Michael Williams
The defendant, Michael Williams, was convicted of rape, a Class B felony, and sentenced to thirty years in the Tennessee Department of Correction as a violent offender. In his appeal, he argues that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support his conviction for rape. However, we disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Allen Jean Stephens
Allen Jean Stephens appeals from his Weakley County Circuit Court conviction of Class D felony theft of property. Stephens claims in this appeal that the lower court erred in admitting the telephone records of the business that the defendant defrauded in the course of committing his crime. Because we hold that these records were erroneously but harmlessly admitted, we affirm. |
Weakley | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. LaQuenton Monger
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Brian Keith Gilmer
Defendant, Brian Keith Gilmer, pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, pled guilty to four counts of rape, Class B felonies, and five counts of rape of a child, Class A felonies, in Case No. 6975 in the Circuit Court of Jefferson County. On the same date, he pled guilty to five counts of rape, Class B felonies, in Case No. 8161 in the Circuit Court of Sevier County. The victim in all counts, in both counties, was Defendant's stepdaughter. Sentencing was to be determined by the trial court (which was the same for both counties), but the negotiated plea agreement was structured such that the total effective sentence would not be less than 15 years or more than 50 years. Defendant also pled guilty to other criminal offenses as part of the plea agreement, but these are not relevant to this appeal. Although Defendant filed a notice of appeal indicating that he was appealing the sentences imposed in both the Jefferson and Sevier County cases, in effect, this appeal challenges only the length of sentences of the Class A felonies in the Jefferson County case, and the fact that one Class A felony was ordered to be served consecutively to the other sentences. We affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Jefferson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Sean A. Turner, alias; Sean Andre Turner
Defendant, Shaun A. Turner, alias Shaun Andre Turner, appeals from the trial court's order revoking his probation and ordering him to serve two consecutive sentences in the Department of Correction. After reviewing the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. William C. Bentley
Defendant, William C. Bentley, was convicted by a Davidson County jury of attempted aggravated robbery. In this appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction, and argues that the trial court committed reversible error by admitting hearsay testimony. After a thorough review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals |