State vs. Kevin S. Phillips
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Cora Moton v. Kellogg USA, Inc.
|
Shelby | Workers Compensation Panel | |
Helen Mccurrie v. Eaton Corporation
|
Gibson | Workers Compensation Panel | |
State vs. Charles Hayes
|
Marshall | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Leslie R. Holt
|
Wilson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9708-CR-00329
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Jerry E. Biggs vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Charles Haynes vs. State
|
Hickman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Hopson v. Philips
|
Knox | Workers Compensation Panel | |
Suerth v. Red Kap
|
Knox | Workers Compensation Panel | |
03A01-9804-CV-00145
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9804-CV-00145
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Tn Farmers Mutual Ins. vs. Inman
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Sherer vs. Linginfelter
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Ellis vs. Trentham
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Stewart vs. Stewart
|
Court of Appeals | ||
State vs. Rema Morgan
|
Campbell | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Brian Thomas Kluever
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Delivetrick Blocker
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Tyrone Chalmers
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Devon Crawford
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Donald Culbreath & Genna McCallie
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Thomas Boone
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Francesca Turner & Charles Taylor
|
Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Michelle Ball for herself and next of kind of Miranda K. Ball, Deceased, v. Hamilton County Emergency Medical Services
This civil action was filed by Michelle Ball ("Ms Ball") against Hamilton County Emergency Medical Services ("HCEMS") and others, seeking damages for the wrongful death of Ms. Ball's 16-month-old daughter, Miranda K. Ball ("Miranda"). The suit against HCEMS brought into play the provision of the Govermental Tort Liability Act. Following a bench trial, the court dismissed the complaint as to HCEMS, finding that HCEMS did not have a duty to transport Miranda to the hospital in the face of her mother's decision at the child's condition was not such as to require a trip to the hospital. The court further fond that HCEMS' emergency medical technicians ("the EMTS") did not violate their standard of care by failing to advise Ms. Ball that croup could be life-threatening under certain circumstances. Ms. Ball appealed, raising issues that present the following questions for our determination: |
Court of Appeals |