Address The Parole Eligibility Jury Instruction. In State v. King, ____ S.W.2D ____
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. James Nichols
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Planned Parenthood Association vs. McWherter
|
Court of Appeals | ||
West vs. Luna
|
Lincoln | Court of Appeals | |
Wachtel vs. Western Sizzlin Corp.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Williamson Co. Broadcasting vs. Intermedia Partners
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Tipton vs. Burr & Blue Ridge Drilling
|
Fentress | Court of Appeals | |
Tanya Tucker, et al vs. Capitol Records, Inc.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Gary Prude
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Michael Martin
|
Lake | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Robert Taylor
|
Haywood | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Linda L. Mires v. David Clay and Bill Hayes, et al.
This case involves the violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) in connection with a breach of a residential construction contract. Defendant, Bill Hayes, appeals the judgment of the trial court on a jury verdict awarding plaintiff, Linda Mires, $5,000.00 for 1Rufus and Linda Mires filed the original suit in April 1995 but took a voluntary nonsuit. Mr. Mires died after the suit was refiled, so Mrs. Mires amended the complaint to list herself as plaintiff, individually, and as the executrix of the estate of Rufus Mires. Since Mr. Mires was alive throughout the events that precipitated this suit, we use the plural “plaintiffs” throughout this opinion. 2 violation of TCPA and the trial court’s order awarding plaintiff $5,907.50 in attorney fees and expenses. |
Weakley | Court of Appeals | |
Jacob E. Carter v. Lumbermen's Underwriting
|
Carter | Workers Compensation Panel | |
James Walker Hurst v. Scruggs, Inc.
|
Knox | Workers Compensation Panel | |
Donna Lee Stephen v. R. C. Leamon and Conditionaire Company, Inc.
|
Knox | Workers Compensation Panel | |
State vs. Creekmore
|
Scott | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Ramsey
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Robinson
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Franklin
|
Cumberland | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Don Carter
|
McNairy | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Bradford/Jacqueline Roberts vs. City of Memphis
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Ancro Finance vs. Consumers Ins.
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Charlene Hardison - Concurring/Dissenting
I concur with a ll portions of Judge Lafferty’s op inion with the exception of the portion that reduces the period of confinem ent from six (6) months to ninety (90) days. I might agree with that ultimate result after a specific finding of facts by the trial court following the dictates of the Tennessee Criminal Sentencing Reform Act of 1989. However, it is my opinion that the more appropriate disposition of this particular case is to remand it back to the trial court for a new sentencing hearing which follows the specific requirements of the A ct. See State v. Ervin, 939 S.W.2d 581, 584-85 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996) and cases cited therein. |
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Charlene Hardison
The defendant, Charlene Hardison, appeals of right from a ruling of the Williamson County Criminal Court in which the trial court imposed a sentence of six (6) months confinement in the Williamson County Jail for the offense of driving on a revoke d license. Also, the Williamson County Criminal Court consolidated an appeal of the defendant for violation of probation from the Williamson County General Sessions Court. After a sentencing hearing, the trial court upheld the judgment of the General Sessions Court and ordered the defendant to serve six (6) months, less forty-five (45) days credit, as per her plea of guilty, to run concurrently with the sentence for driving on a revoked license. Af ter a review of the entire r ecord, brief s of the parties and applicable law, we affirm the trial court’s judgment as to the revocation of probation, but remand the sentences as modified. |
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Roger Terry Johnson v. State of Tennessee
The appellant, Roger Terrance Johnson, appeals as of right from the Davidson County Criminal Court’s dismissal of his petition for post conviction relief. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals |