Of This Case Are Analogous To The Facts In State v. Hoyt, 928 S.W.2D 935 (Tenn.
02C01-9610-CR-00369Cecil
Trial Court Judge: Arthur T. Bennett

State vs. Gregory Simmons
02C01-9611-CR-00432
Trial Court Judge: Carolyn Wade Blackett

Williamson vs. Sanders
03A01-9705-JV-00184

Henson vs. Carte r
03A01-9706-CV-00230

Haren vs. Haren
03A01-9707-CV-00253

Deroyal vs. Johnson
03A01-9708-CH-00328

Graves vs. Grady's
03A01-9708-CV-00336

Ridley vs. Ridley
03A01-9708-GS-00350

Smith v. Lauren
03S01-9701-CH-00003
Authoring Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr., Special Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. G. Richard Johnson,
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. _________________________________ Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr., Special Judge CONCUR: ________________________________ John K. Byers, Senior Judge ________________________________ Adolpho A. Birch, Jr., Justice 2

Logan vs. State
03C01-9610-CR-00387

McDonald vs. State
03C01-9703-CC-00103
Trial Court Judge: Steve R. Bebb

Mitchell vs. State
03C01-9704-CR-00125
Trial Court Judge: Lynn W. Brown

03C01-9703-CR-00098
03C01-9703-CR-00098
Trial Court Judge: R. Jerry Beck

State vs. John Thomas
02C01-9611-CR-00436
Trial Court Judge: Joseph B. Dailey

State vs. Myron Garmon
02C01-9611-CR-00437
Trial Court Judge: James C. Beasley, Jr.

State vs. Roger Kimmel
02C01-9701-CR-00006
Trial Court Judge: Joseph B. Dailey

State vs. Roger Kimmel
02C01-9701-CR-00006
Trial Court Judge: Joseph B. Dailey

State vs. Cavious Watkins
02C01-9701-CR-00031
Trial Court Judge: James C. Beasley, Jr.

State vs. John Roe
02C01-9702-CR-00054
Trial Court Judge: Jon Kerry Blackwood

M & M vs. Maples
03A01-9705-CH-00171

State of Tennessee vs. Venson Earl Woodard
01C01-9511-CC-00379
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry L. Smith
Trial Court Judge: Judge Charles Lee

A Bedford County Circuit Court jury found Appellant Venson Woodard guilty of two counts of aggravated assault. As a Range II multiple offender, he received a sentence of nine years and eight months in the Tennessee Department of Correction. The trial court ordered the sentence to be served consecutive to a sente nce for which Appellant was on parole at the tim e of the offense. In this appeal, Appellant presents the following issue for review: whether the trial court violated its duty to act as a thirteenth juror by refusing to grant Appellant’s motion for a new trial. Specifically Appellant maintains the weight of the evidence shows he was acting in self-defense.
 

After a review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial co urt.

Tennessee Department of Health, Division of Health Related Boards and The Board of Medical Examiners, v. W. Dwight Frisbee, M.D.
01A01-9511-CH-00540
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Robert S. Brandt

This appeal presents an issue of first impression concerning the evidentiary standards applicable to disciplinary proceedings involving licensed physicians. The Tennessee Department of Health perfected an interlocutory appeal to the Chancery Court for Davidson County after an administrative law judge disqualified its expert witness for failing to satisfy the locality rule generally applicable in medical malpractice cases. The trial court reversed the administrative law judge’s decision after concluding that a physician’s conduct should be measured by a statewide standard of minimum competency rather than a particularized local standard of care. While the administrative law judge’s decision was correct with regard to two of thecharges, we affirm the trial court’s decision in part because several of the charges in this proceeding only require proof that a physician has failed to meet statewide, minimal competency standards.

Demetra Lyree Parker, v. Warren County Utility District
01A01-9704-CH-00175
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Highers
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor John W. Rollins

Plaintiff Demetra Lyree Parker appeals the trial court’s order granting the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant/Appellee W arren County Utility District. We reverse the trial court’s judgment based on our conclusion that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether the Utility District responded promptly, adequately, and effectively to Parker’s allegations of sexual harassment against the Utility District’s general manager.

Winslow Watson, v. Tennessee Department of Correction, Tennessee Board of Paroles, CCA, and Jody Benjamin
01A01-9707-CH-00360
Authoring Judge: Judge Samuel L. Lewis
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Carol L. McCoy

This is an appeal by petitioner/appellant, Winslow Watson, from a decision of the chancery court dismissing his petition for a declaratory judgment pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, Tennessee Code Annotated section 29-14-101 to -113. The facts out of which this matter arose are as follows.

Porter Freeman vs. Robert Ring, County Executive, Jerry Sharber, Mayor, et al., - Concurring
01-A-01-9705-CH-00237
Authoring Judge: Judge Walter W. Bussart
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Henry Denmark Bell

The appellant sought to enjoin both city and county officials from the sale of general obligation bonds. The Chancery Court of Franklin granted all  defendants' motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12.02(6) of the  Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure. On appeal, we must determine  whether the trial court erred in not considering the petition for injunction on the merits as against either the city or the county defendants.