Marvin & Ellyse McCarley vs. West Food Quality Service
|
Supreme Court | ||
Marvin & Ellyse McCarley vs. West Food Quality Service
|
Supreme Court | ||
Gregory Eidson vs. State
|
Sumner | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
King v. State
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Gray
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. John P. Pelfrey
|
Wilson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Jimmy Lee Heard vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Randall Lunsford
|
Wilson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Douglas Trammell vs. State
|
Montgomery | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Taft Douglas vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Henry B. Waggoner vs. David Mills Warden
|
Hickman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Thomas E. Montooth vs. State
|
White | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Lutcher O. Miles & Amber Dawn Miles
|
Cheatham | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Terry Wayne Farrar
|
Bedford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. John Earnest
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs, Albert Lewis
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Ricky Tucker
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Milton Spears, Jr.
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Carolyn Franklin and Edward J. Franklin v. Rebecca A. Kimberly, et. al. - Concurring
This is an appeal from an interlocutory ruling which the Trial Judge rendered final as provided by TRCP Rule 54.02. The controversy on appeal is between St. Paul Insurance Company, a/k/a Economy Fire and Casualty Company, (hereafter St. Paul), and Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance Company (hereafter Tennessee Farmers). The plaintiffs have filed a brief in support of their interest in the disposition of the appeal. |
Maury | Court of Appeals | |
Tom Milligan and wife Louise Millgan v. Curtis George and wife Wilma George
This interlocutory appeal involves a boundary line dispute between neighbors who live along Wilmouth Creek in Cannon County. Following inconclusive litigation between two of their neighbors, the owners of one of the tracts filed a boundary line action in the Chancery Court for Cannon County against the owners of one of the adjoining tracts that had been involved in the earlier litigation. The defending landowners moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the decision in the earlier litigation was res judicata as to the plaintiff landowners’ claims. The trial court denied the motion but grante permission to seek an interlocutory appeal. We granted the application for permission to appeal and now affirm the denial of the motion to dismiss because the parties in this case and the former case are not the same. |
Cannon | Court of Appeals | |
In re: Estate of Ora Sloan Blankenship, Deceased, Katherine Sloan Braden and Steve Sloan, v. Billie Ann Gann
This matter appears appropriate for consideration pursuant to Rule 10(a) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals of Tennessee.1 In this case, the decedent, Ora Sloan Blankenship (“Blankenship”), 84 years old, died on June 24, 1994. Subsequently, a petition was filed to probate Blankenship’s alleged holographic will. The purported holographic will named one of Blankenship’s sisters, Kathryn Braden (“Braden”) and Blankenship’s nephew, Steve Sloan (“Sloan”) as co-representatives of the estate. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Mark E. Miller, v. Michael P. Schrimpf, Rita Schrimpf, and Tennessee Title and Trust Inc., et al.
The purchaser of a subdivision lot sued his agent and the sellers’ agent because the lot could not be approved for a septic tank. His complaint stated causes of action for fraud, negligence, and a violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. The Chancery Court of Sumner County granted summary judgment to both agents. We reverse the simple negligence claim as to the purchaser’s own agent. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed. |
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Pig Improvement Co. Inc., v. Curt Reaver & Richard Alan Tracey, Jr. - Concurring
This is an appeal by plaintiff/appellant, Pig Improvement Co., Inc., from a decision of the Sixth Circuit Court for Davidson County dismissing Pig Improvements’s complaint against defendants/appellees, Curt Reaver and Richard Alan Tracey, Jr. The facts out of which this matter arose are as follows. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Diana Sue Long, v. Michael George Long
This is an appeal by the defendant, Michael George Long, from that portion of the trial court’s judgment which awarded alimony in futuro to his former wife, Diana Sue Long, who was the plaintiff below. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Diana Sue Long, v. Michael George Long
This is an appeal by the defendant, Michael George Long, from that portion of the trial court’s judgment which awarded alimony in futuro to his former wife, Diana Sue Long, who was the plaintiff below. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals |