Guy Alexander, Jr., Royce Taylor, and Skyline Apartments Partnership v. Third National Bank
This case presents for review the decision of the Court of Appeals sustaining the defendant's motion for summary judgment on the ground the suit is barred by the three year statute of limitations. This Court finds the essential cause of action alleged is breach of contract rather than injury to property and, therefore, the applicable limitation period is six years rather than three years. |
Davidson | Supreme Court | |
03C01-9402-CR-00047
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Supreme Court | ||
03S01-9404-CV-00019
|
Supreme Court | ||
01S01-9502-CV-00029
|
Supreme Court | ||
01S01-9502-CV-00029
|
Supreme Court | ||
Benny Smith, ET UX, Geraldine Smith v. Bobbie Jo Smith (McClintock) - Concurring
The captioned respondent has appealed from an order entered by the Trial Court regulating visitation of the two children of respondent with the captioned petitioners, parents of respondent's deceased husband. Respondent-mother has remarried, and her husband, David McClintock, has adopted the children. However, he is not a party to this proceeding. |
Overton | Court of Appeals | |
Tom and Karen Moore, v. Lloyd A. Walwyn, M.D. - Dissenting
Both the trial court and the majority of this panel have decided that Tom and Karen Moore are not entitled to a jury trial on their medical malpractice claim against Dr. Lloyd A. Walwyn because of shortcomings in the affidavits they filed in opposition to Dr. Walwyn’s motion for summary judgment. While I do not relish defending sloppy lawyering, I am convinced that my colleagues have scrutinized the Moores’ counter-affidavits using standards stricter than those required by Tenn. R. Civ. P. 56.05 and Tenn. Code Ann. § 29-26-115 (1980). I would vacate the summary judgment because the counter-affidavits demonstrate the existence of genuine and material factual issues that only a jury should resolve. |
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee, v. Jacob Kyle Tipton
This case presents what is purportedly an appeal under Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 37(b). The issue of law involves a juvenile's plea of guilty to delinquency in the Circuit Court of Dickson County. |
Dickson | Court of Appeals | |
Charles N. Delattie v. South Mark Realty Partners, LTD., d/b/a Hickory Lake Apartment Community - Concurring
Charles N. Delatte ("plaintiff") filed suit in the Circuit Court of Davidson County against South Mark Realty Partners, Ltd. ("defendant") seeking damages for injuries sustained by him when a metal hand railing on a stairway in the common area of defendant's apartment complex collapsed, causing him to fall. The trial court granted defendant's motions for summary judgment. The sole issue presented by this appeal is whether the trial court was in error in so doing. For the reasons herein set forth, we find no error and affirm. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
03C01-9504-CR-00123
|
Anderson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Michael South
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Section of This Court In Webster v. Tennessee Bd. of Regents, 902 S.W.2D 412 (Tenn. App.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
01C01-9502-CC-00037
|
Marshall | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9505-CR-00136
|
Sumner | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9412-CR-00409
|
Sumner | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9412-CR-00409
|
Sumner | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9504-CC-00118
|
Marshall | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Carl E. Smith and wife, Vada Smith, and Lucille Crockett, v. William R. Reed, and wife Linda Gail Reed
From the decision of the Trial Court establishing a boundary line dividing tracts of land owned by the parties, the Defendants appeal. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01C01-9505-CC-00131
|
Putnam | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Teresa K. Ross v. William P. Ross
From the decision of the Trial Court modifying the final decree of divorce between the parties, terminating payments of spousal support previously ordered to be paid by the husband to the wife, the wife appeals. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Blake Weber, v. Jack Moses, Individually and Jeffson Pilot Life Ins. Co.
Plaintiff-Appellant Blake Weber brought suit against the Defendants-Appellees, Jack Moses and Jefferson Pilot LIfe Insurance Company ("Jefferson Pilot"), alleging that he was unlawfully discharged due to his refusal to participate in Appellee Jefferson Pilot's illegal employment practices. The chancellor dismissed Appellant's suit, stating that this cause of action was barred by the applicable one year statute of limitation. Weber appeals the lower court's dismissal of his Complaint.
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9412-CH-00278
|
Decatur | Court of Appeals |