Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

COURT

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Sort by

Order

02A01-9410-CV-00229 02A01-9410-CV-00229 Trial Court Judge: Robert L. Childers	Shelby	Court of Appeals	01/16/96
03S01-9410-CH-00091 03S01-9410-CH-00091		Supreme Court	01/16/96
03C01-9503-CR-00071 03C01-9503-CR-00071	Roane	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/16/96
03C01-9503-CR-00071 03C01-9503-CR-00071	Roane	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/16/96
03C01-9406-CR-00242 03C01-9406-CR-00242	Knox	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/12/96
03C01-9406-CR-00242 03C01-9406-CR-00242 Trial Court Judge: Richard R. Baumgartner	Knox	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/12/96
03C01-9502-CR-00034 03C01-9502-CR-00034 Trial Court Judge: Mayo L. Mashburn	Bradley	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/12/96
General Oils Company, Division of Ashland Oil, Inc., v. Claude Ramsey, Assessor of Property for Hamilton County, Tennessee and TN State Board of Equalization 01A01-9504-CH-00153 Authoring Judge: Senior Judge Tomlin Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Robert S. Brandt General Oils Company ("plaintiff") filed suit in the Chancery Court of Davidson County against the Assessor of Property for Hamilton County ("Hamilton County Assessor") and the Tennessee State Board of Equalization ("Board of Equalization") seeking judicial review of the decision by the Assessment Appeals Commission ("AAC") of the Board of Equalization that for tax assessment purposes plaintiff's petroleum storage tanks located in Hamilton County were real property. The chancellor reversed the AAC, holding that the tanks were personal property. On appeal Hamilton County Assessor and Board of Equalization present one issue 1On appeal the Board of Equalization only challenges the lower court's action to the effect that tanks are automatically considered tangible personal property under T.C.A. § 67-5-903(f) for property tax purposes. Because the broader issue raised by Hamilton County Assessor in essence encompasses this secondary issue, we approach this case from the standpoint of Hamilton County Assessor. 2 for our consideration: Whether the trial court erred in holding that the storage tanks should be classified as personal property for tax assessment purposes.1 For the reasons hereinafter stated, we find no error and affirm.	Hamilton	Court of Appeals	01/12/96
Sue McGee v. The First National Bank and Neal Lovlace, Jr., - Concurring 01A01-9508-CV-00341 Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford Trial Court Judge: Judge James L. Weatherford This appeal involves a venue dispute. Plaintiff, Sue McGee, appeals from the order of the Circuit Court for the Twenty-Second Judicial District in Maury County, Tennessee, that dismissed her suit against defendants, First National Bank and Neal Lovlace, for improper venue. The record in the case consists of what was formerly called the technical record and a "transcript of proceedings" which has no testimony and contains only argument and statements of counsel and the court.	Maury	Court of Appeals	01/12/96
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX	Anderson	Court of Appeals	01/12/96
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX	Hamblen	Court of Appeals	01/12/96
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX	Washington	Court of Appeals	01/12/96
03A01-9509-CV-00320 03A01-9509-CV-00320	Hamilton	Court of Appeals	01/11/96
03C01-9501-CR-00004 03C01-9501-CR-00004 Trial Court Judge: James E. Beckner	Hancock	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/11/96
03C01-9501-CR-00027 03C01-9501-CR-00027	Hamilton	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/11/96
01C01-9503-CC-00063 01C01-9503-CC-00063 Trial Court Judge: Lee Russell	Marshall	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/11/96
01C01-9404-CR-00154 01C01-9404-CR-00154 Trial Court Judge: Seth W. Norman	Davidson	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/11/96
01C01-9408-CC-00286 01C01-9408-CC-00286 Trial Court Judge: Jim T. Hamilton	Maury	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/11/96
01C01-9411-CC-00391 01C01-9411-CC-00391 Trial Court Judge: W. Charles Lee	Marshall	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/11/96
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX	Rhea	Court of Appeals	01/11/96
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX	Sevier	Court of Appeals	01/11/96
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX	Bradley	Court of Appeals	01/11/96
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX	Hamilton	Court of Appeals	01/11/96
Jack Layne Benson vs. State M1999-01649-CCA-R3-PC Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R Wade Trial Court Judge: W. Charles Lee The petitioner, Jack Layne Benson, appeals the trial court's dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. Convicted in 1996 of first degree felony murder and especially aggravated robbery, and sentenced to consecutive terms of life and 24 years, the petitioner contended that he was entitled to post-conviction relief on the grounds that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel at trial and on direct appeal. In this appeal, the petitioner argues that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to adequately communicate, for failing to adequately investigate, and for failing to obtain a transcript of the preliminary hearing. The petitioner argues that his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to present additional issues on direct appeal. Because the petitioner has been unable to establish both deficiency in the performance of his counsel and prejudice in consequence thereof, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.	Bedford	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/10/96
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX		Court of Appeals	01/10/96