Tennessee Farmer's Mutual Insurance Company v. Billy Wagner and wife Mona G. Wagner
The issues in this appeal are (1) whether the misrepresentations in an application for insurance made the policy void as to the applicant and (2) whether the insurance was void as to the appellant's wife, who did not sign the application. The Circuit Court of Lawrence County granted summary judgment to the insurance company. We affirm. |
Lawrence | Court of Appeals | |
John M. Cannon, Grayson Smith Cannon, and Cannon, Cannon, & Cooper v. Susan Garner Abby, Davidson Circuit Rubenfeld, individually and D/B/A Rubenfeld & Associates
The appellants are two lawyers who are defendants below in a malicious prosecution and abuse of process case. We granted their motion for an extraordinary appeal, to review the trial court's holding that the work product doctrine did not prevent the discovery of certain information generated in the prior case. We affirm the trial court's order |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee o.b.o., Linda C. Britton, v. Robert Eugene Kyer
This cause commenced when plaintiff Linda Britton filed a petition to establish paternity and for child support in West Virginia, pursuant to that state's Uniform Reciprocal Support Act (URESA). The petition was forwarded to the Circuit Court for Coffee County, Tennessee for prosecution. |
Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
Vickie Dianne Tuttle v. Robert Edward Tuttle
This appeal involves a divorce in which the husband has been incarcerated throughout the marriage. After approximately four years of marriage, both the wife and the husband filed suit for divorce in the Circuit Court for Coffee County. Following a bench trial attended only by the wife, the trial court granted the wife a divorce on the grounds that the husband was incarcerated and that his conviction had rendered him infamous. On this appeal, the husband asserts that the trial court should not have granted the wife a divorce because she did not properly verify her complaint and asserts that he did not receive property that was rightfully his. We have determined that the judgment should be affirmed and that the case should be remanded for consideration of the husband’s property claims. |
Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
01C01-9402-CR-00067
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9304-CR-00136
|
Claiborne | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9304-CR-00136
|
Claiborne | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Rutherford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9504-CR-00107
|
Sumner | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9503-CC-00057
|
Stewart | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03A01-9506-CV-00195
|
Court of Appeals | ||
03A01-9508-CH-00257
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9508-CH-00258
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
02C01-9503-CC-00077
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Cyril v. Fraser
|
Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9502-CR-00030
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02A01-9312-BC-00267
|
Court of Appeals | ||
02A01-9405-CV-00106
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9411-PB-00250
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02C01-9501-CC-00019
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9501-CR-00014
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals |