Kevin Sanders v. Jerry Mansfield M2001-01893-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Plaintiffs appeal an injunction preventing them from interfering with county maintenance of a public road running through their property. We affirm the trial court in this matter and uphold the injunction against Plaintiffs.
Lincoln
Court of Appeals
Ingram v. Beazer Homes M2001-01641-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Jones
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.
This litigation arises from the 1994 sale of a newly constructed house and lot backing up to a subdivision common area with an existing natural sinkhole, which is utilized for surface water drainage from several nearby lots. During development of the subdivision the defendant filled the area including a portion of the lot purchased by the plaintiffs. In 1997, the plaintiffs became concerned about the ground settling in their back yard and about perceived dangers of the nearby sinkhole. They sued the defendant as subdivision developer, house builder, and seller of the property and sought rescission or alternative relief. The Chancery Court ordered rescission with the plaintiffs recovering the appreciated value at the time of trial and the cost of improvements, plus prejudgment interest on that total, but without any setoff for the rental value during the plaintiffs' occupancy. We reverse and remand due to errors in the trial court's calculation of the amount payable upon rescission and related issues. While we could affirm the rescission, we are reluctant to limit the parties and the trial court to that remedy, since we anticipate additional proof by the parties and a significantly different result upon remand.
Davidson
Court of Appeals
Jennifer Branham vs. Jeffery Branham E2003-01253-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Thomas R. Frierson, II
Mother petitioned the Court to relocate to Kentucky with the parties child, which the Trial Court granted. On appeal, we affirm.
Hamblen
Court of Appeals
Charles Crews (Dexter Ridge Shopping Center) vs. Michael Cahhal, et al. W1999-02354-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Trial Court Judge: Karen R. Williams
This is a breach of contract case. The plaintiff developer leased space to a corporation for use as a restaurant. The shareholders of the corporation entered into a separate agreement with the developer to guarantee the lease. The corporation defaulted on the lease. The developer filed unlawful detainer warrants in general sessions court against both the corporation and the shareholder guarantors. Thereafter, the corporation filed for bankruptcy, thus staying the general sessions court proceedings as to the corporation. The general sessions court dismissed the entire action, including the claim against the guarantors, because the bankruptcy stay prevented the developer from recovering possession. This decision was appealed to circuit court. Meanwhile, the developer had filed a second lawsuit for breach of contract against the guarantors. The second lawsuit was consolidated with the appeal of the unlawful detainer action pending in circuit court. After a trial, the circuit court affirmed the dismissal of the unlawful detainer action and dismissed the breach of contract action based on the doctrine of former suit pending. This appeal followed. We reverse and remand, finding, inter alia, that the action in general sessions court against the guarantors was for breach of contract and, therefore, recovery of possession of the premises was not required in order to obtain an award of damages against the guarantors.
Shelby
Court of Appeals
Margaret Parker vs. Kroger Co. W2001-01977-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: James F. Russell
Plaintiff, a Tennessee resident, slipped and fell in a Kroger store in Texas. Plaintiff sued defendant in Shelby County Circuit Court, and the parties agreed that Texas law was applicable. The trial court granted summary judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. We reverse and remand.
Shelby
Court of Appeals
Dept. of Children Serv. vs. Davina Frazier W2001-01935-COA-R3-JV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Christy R. Little
Minor child was removed from mother's custody because mother neglected to provide child with proper medical care and treatment. Mother entered into a permanency plan and child was temporarily placed with a family member. The trial court terminated mother's parental rights to the child, finding clear and convincing evidence that: (1) mother had not substantially complied with the conditions of the permanency plan; (2) there was little likelihood that the conditions leading to child's removal would be remedied in the near future, and that the continuation of the parent-child relationship would greatly diminish the child's chances of early integration into a safe, stable and permanent home. Mother has appealed. We affirm
Madison
Court of Appeals
Judith Steele vs. Columbia Health Care W2001-01692-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: William B. Acree
This is a medical malpractice case. Plaintiff's husband, Mr. Steele, arrived at Defendant's emergency room complaining of chest pains. An EKG illustrated that he was suffering a heart attack. Mr. Steele underwent subsequent treatments and an additional EKG. The second EKG was abnormal, and Dr. Urankar, a physician at Defendant's emergency room decided to administer tPA, a "clot busting" drug. While Dr. Urankar was preparing to administer the tPA, Mr. Steele's condition significantly worsened, and he eventually died. At trial, Plaintiff introduced expert testimony from Dr. Carr regarding the applicable standard of care and causation. Defendant objected to portions of Dr. Carr's testimony. The jury awarded Plaintiff damages, and Defendant appeals, citing error in Dr. Carr's testimony. We affirm the decision of the trial court.
Weakley
Court of Appeals
Trent Marcus vs. Lorraine Marcus W2001-00906-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Trial Court Judge: George H. Brown
This case involves a petition to enroll a foreign judgment. The parties were married in Tennessee and later moved to North Carolina. While living in North Carolina, the parties separated and the husband filed for divorce in North Carolina. The wife filed a counterclaim for divorce in North Carolina, seeking permanent and pendente lite alimony. The North Carolina court ordered the husband to pay pendente lite alimony. While the North Carolina proceedings were pending, husband moved to Arkansas and obtained a divorce in Arkansas. In light of the Arkansas divorce, the wife filed a voluntary dismissal of her North Carolina counterclaim. The husband then filed a motion in North Carolina under a North Carolina statute, seeking reimbursement of the pendente lite alimony he had paid to the wife. The North Carolina court entered a judgment ordering the wife to reimburse the husband for the alimony payments. The wife did not file an appeal in North Carolina. The husband then filed a petition to enroll the North Carolina judgment in Tennessee. The Tennessee trial court enrolled the North Carolina judgment. The wife now appeals. We affirm, finding that the North Carolina court had subject matter jurisdiction under its statutes to enter the judgment and that the North Carolina judgment was not contrary to Tennessee public policy.
Shelby
Court of Appeals
Lorenzo Childress Jr. vs. Union Realty W2001-01742-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: George H. Brown
Plaintiff lessee in this case sued defendant landlord for damages associated with loss of personal property, interruption of business, and lost profits which resulted from the collapse of a roof and flooding of plaintiff's leased medical offices. The jury awarded plaintiff $168,000.00 in damages. Defendant appeals, arguing that this is, in effect, a subrogation suit by plaintiff's insurance carrier. We find no evidence that this is a subrogation suit and affirm judgment for plaintiff.
Mechanic's Laundry vs. Auto Glass W2001-01113-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: George H. Brown
In this breach of contract case, defendant corporation denies liability under the contract because defendant's employee who signed the contract, ostensibly on behalf of the corporation, had no authority to do so. Plaintiff contends that the person signing the contract had apparent authority to act for the corporation. The trial court granted summary judgment to the plaintiff. Defendant appeals. We vacate, render, and remand.
Shelby
Court of Appeals
Anthony Doty vs. Patrick Whalen W2001-01854-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Dewey C. Whitenton
Petitioner-inmate filed a petition for writ of mandamus to require the defendants, prison warden and other officials, to restore visitation privileges of the plaintiff's girlfriend and to expunge from the prison records all references to the revocation of the visitation privileges and to the alleged sexual misconduct that precipitated the revocation. After a nonjury trial, the trial court entered an order of dismissal. Plaintiff has appealed. We affirm as modified and remand for further proceedings.
Hardeman
Court of Appeals
James Gunter v. Tim Emerton M2001-00364-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: John J. Maddux
In this action against a police officer for invasion of privacy by placing the plaintiff in false light the trial court granted summary judgment to the defendant. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial judge erred by granting summary judgment on a defense not raised by the defendant. We affirm.
M2000-03214-COA-R3-JV M2000-03214-COA-R3-JV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Betty Adams Green
Davidson
Court of Appeals
Southwest Williamson County Community Assoc. v. J. Bruce Saltsman M2001-00654-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.
A group of Williamson County residents whose property was threatened by highway construction filed a Petition for a Declaratory Order against the Tennessee Department of Transportation. They argued that the Department violated the statute that authorized the project by not complying with the environmental standards for construction of an interstate highway. The Administrative Law Judge denied the petition, and the trial court affirmed the ALJ. We affirm the trial court.
Williamson
Court of Appeals
Nashville Sash & Door . v. TriStar Builders M2001-01160-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Chancellor Jeffrey F. Stewart
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz
In this case Nashville Sash and Door, Inc. sued Tristar Builders, Inc. and its two stockholders, Robert J. Ivy and Richard L. Cammeron on a debt arising from credit extended under an application of credit. At the conclusion of the plaintiff's proof the trial judge granted the defendants motion under Rule 41 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure and dismissed the complaint. Nashville Sash and Door, Inc. has appealed that decision. We affirm the Trial Court.
Bharat Gandhi v. William Rucker M2001-00271-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Barbara N. Haynes
This is an appeal by Defendant from denial by the trial court of a Rule 60.02 motion to set aside a judgment on the basis of mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. The trial court denied the motion, and on consideration of the record, we reverse the judgment and remand the case for a trial on the merits.
Davidson
Court of Appeals
Gloria Snow-Koledoye vs. Horace Mann Ins. Co. M2000-02954-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz
This case involves a settlement of an insurance claim under the comprehensive coverage of an automobile insurance policy. Wife, named insured in the policy, sued the insurance company for breach of contract in delivering to husband a settlement check made jointly payable to wife and her husband, after husband apparently negotiated the check. Wife amended her complaint to name her ex-husband as an additional defendant, and he filed an answer to the complaint. In a nonjury trial, the trial court entered judgment for plaintiff-wife against the insurance company. Insurance company appealed. We vacate.
Davidson
Court of Appeals
Janet Goodart vs. Kamalin Kazmar-Grice M2001-00663-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Leonard W. Martin
Former wife and children of decedent sued in the chancery court to enroll a foreign decree of divorce and, inter alia, to impose a constructive trust on proceeds of a Servicemen's Group Life Insurance policy payable to the decedent widow after the decedent prior to his death changed the policy beneficiary contrary to a marital dissolution agreement and final decree of divorce. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of decedent widow. Former wife appealed. We affirm.
Stewart
Court of Appeals
Ray C. Hall v. TN. Workers Credit Union M2001-01346-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle
Husband and Wife obtained a loan from a credit union and pledged their home as security for the note under a Deed of Trust. The Deed of Trust required Husband and Wife to maintain property taxes and insurance on the property. The credit union foreclosed on the property after Husband and Wife continuously failed to maintain the taxes and insurance. Husband and Wife filed suit against the credit union, arguing that the agreement between the parties did not provide the remedy of foreclosure for mere nonpayment of taxes and insurance. The trial court granted summary judgment for the credit union. Because we find that the agreement between the parties provides the remedy of foreclosure for breach of any promise made under the agreement, including the promise to pay property taxes and insurance, we find that the trial court was correct in granting summary judgment for the credit union and affirm that decision.
Davidson
Court of Appeals
Jerry Noe v. Melissa Noe (Barnes) M2001-02223-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Leonard W. Martin
This is an appeal by the Wife in a divorce case complaining of the disposition of marital property. The Husband also complains about an award of alimony in solido against him. We affirm the Chancellor.
