Doyle Shirt Manufacturing Corporation, v. T. Michael O'Mara, et al.
This appeal involves the requirement of Tennessee Rule of Civil Procedure 11.01 that pleadings be signed by an attorney or by a party if that party is not represented by an attorney. Finding that the plaintiff did not comply with Rule 11 within the statutory period of limitations, the Putnam County Chancery Court granted summary judgment to the defendant. We affirm the decision of the trial court. |
Putnam | Court of Appeals | |
Brenda Kaye Thomas v. Johnny Wayne Thomas
This appeal involves a petition to modify an award of alimony. Appellant, Johnny Wayne Thomas (Husband), appeals the order of the trial court denying Husband’s petition to modify by deletion an award of alimony in futuro awarded to Appellee, Brenda Kaye Thomas (Wife). |
Lake | Court of Appeals | |
Greg Townshend v. Erin Blanding Bingham
This appeal involves a petition to modify child custody. Respondent-Appellant, Erin Blanding Bingham (Mother), appeals from the order of the trial court granting the petition to modify custody filed by Petitioner-Appellee, Thomas Gregory Townshend (Father). |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Estate of Carlisa Toney. a minor, by next friend, parent and guardian, Vernioca M. Toney, Individually, v. Bill Cunningham, Mrs. Bill (Ardia) Cunningham, Percy L. Ward and Mrs. Percy L. (Mary) Ward
In this wrongful death action, the trial court granted a motion to quash process and dismiss complaint filed by Defendants Percy and Mary Ward. Additionally, the trial court granted a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Bill and Ardia Cunningham. Plaintiff Veronica Toney appeals the ruling of the trial court regarding the motion to quash process and dismiss complaint as well as the motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
In Re: Estate of J.B. Warren, Deceased
Respondent Anita W. Goode LeCornu (Respondent) appeals the trial court’s judgment admitting to probate the will of J. B. Warren, Jr. (Testator). We vacate the trial court’s judgment based upon our conclusion that the court erred in ruling that the Testator did not effectively revoke one of the will’s provisions. |
Haywood | Court of Appeals | |
Ray Darris Thompson v. Betty Hammond, et al. - Concurring
Plaintiff Ray Darris Thompson appeals the trial court’s final order entering summary judgment in favor of Defendants/Appellees Betty Hammond, Vernon Brown, June Wesson, Bruce MacDonald, and Christine Bradley. We reverse the trial court’s judgment based on our conclusion that the trial court erred in granting the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment without considering Thompson’s motion to compel discovery. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Billy Wesson and Diane Wesson v. Woodworks, Inc. v. Larry Cupples, D/B/A Construction Company
Defendant Woodworks, Inc., appeals the circuit court’s final judgment in the amount |
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
Myranda Brown, a minor, Candy Brown, a minor, and Sherry Mills, Individually and as Parent and Next Friend of Myranda Brown and Candy Brown v. Jessica M. Chesor and Lisha D. Oaks
This appeal involves a suit for personal injuries and property damage resulting from an automobile accident. Plaintiffs-appellants, Myranda Brown (Brown), Candy Brown (Candy) and Sherri Mills (Mills) appeal the judgment on the jury verdict that awarded plaintiff Mills $922.00 in damages and awarded no damages for plaintiffs Myranda and Candy against defendants, Jessica Chessor (Jessica) and Lisha D. Oaks (Oaks). |
Hardeman | Court of Appeals | |
Hite vs. Glazer Steel
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Lois Winbush vs. Thomas Winbush
|
Chester | Court of Appeals | |
Joann Mooney vs. Joe Sneed
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
B&H Investments, Inc., v. James W. Brooks
This appeal arises from a dispute regarding whether Plaintiff B& H was entitled to a deficiency judgment following a foreclosure sale of Defendants' property. Despite Defendant Brooks' counter-claim of fraud in the sale, the court found that Plaintiff was entitled to a deficiency judgment. Defendant Brooks' motion for new trial or for an amendment of the findings of fact was denied. Brooks appeals this denial. |
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
Jaco vs. Dept. of Health, Bureau of Medicaid
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9807-CH-352
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Fideltity and Casualty Company of New York, v. Gregory Entertainment, Inc.
The primary issue in this case is whether the trial court should have granted Plaintiff's motion to amend its complaint to correct deficiencies that were raised by Defendant in a motion for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiff disputes that the Complaint is deficient, but requested to be allowed to amend the Complaint by attaching discoverable documents that would have been introduced at trisl. We are of the opinion that leave to amend should have been granted.
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Carrie Pinson vs. Michael Tata
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Blevins vs. Blevins
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Citizen's Tri-County Bank vs. Georgia Mutual Ins. Co.
|
Grundy | Court of Appeals | |
Reid vs. Lutche, et al
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Ramsey vs. Ramsey
|
Dickson | Court of Appeals | |
Pigg vs. Casteel, et al
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Helson vs. Cyrus
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Patricia Reed vs. Alamo Rent-a-Car
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Sturdivant vs. Sturdivant
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Frederic R. Harris, Inc., v The Metropolitan Government of Nashville, and Davidson County
Frederic R. Harris, Inc., (FRH), formerly PRC Engineering, Inc., entered into a contract with the Metroolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County (Metro), whereby FRH agreed to provide computer design services to Metro on a cost-plus-fee basis. FRH promised to provide engineering services for the design an implementation of a Computerized Traffic signal system for Metro. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals |