State of Tennessee v. Keenan Murphy
A Madison County jury convicted the Defendant, Keenan A. Murphy, of first degree murder and attempted first degree murder. The trial court sentenced the Defendant to an effective sentence of life imprisonment plus twenty-six years. On appeal, the Defendant argues that the proof is insufficient to support the convictions because the State failed to prove premeditation. The Defendant also asserts that the trial court committed plain error by allowing the State to cross-examine the defense expert about a second shooting the Defendant committed nine days after the offenses in this case. On our review, we respectfully affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. David Parr
The defendant, David Parr, appeals the Stewart County Circuit Court’s imposition of a fully-incarcerative sentence for his guilty-pleaded convictions of possession of methamphetamine and fentanyl with intent to sell or deliver, asking this court to remand to the trial court for consideration of Community Corrections under Code section 40-36- 106(2)(c). Because the superseding indictments violated the principles of double jeopardy and because the trial court lacked jurisdiction to hold the plea submission hearing, the judgments entered on the superseding indictments are void, and we dismiss the appeal. |
Stewart | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Christopher Bolden
A Shelby County jury convicted Defendant, Christopher Bolden, of especially aggravated |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Ginny Elizabeth Parker
The Defendant, Ginny Elizabeth Parker, was convicted following a bench trial of five counts of forgery, for which she received an effective six-year sentence to serve. On appeal, the Defendant argues that: (1) the evidence is insufficient to support her forgery convictions, specifically regarding whether she acted without authorization; (2) the trial court shifted the burden of service of medical records pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 24-7-122(c) from the State to the Defendant; (3) the trial court erroneously admitted proof of a PayPal account that was linked to the victims’ bank account; (4) she is entitled to relief based on cumulative error; and (5) her sentence is grossly disproportionate to her offenses, in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 16 of the Tennessee Constitution. Following our review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Jimmiko Driskell v. State of Tennessee
The Petitioner, Jimmiko Driskell, appeals the denial of her petition for post-conviction |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Marcus Green
The Defendant, Marcus Green, was convicted in the Shelby County Criminal Court of first |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Ahmed G. Mohd Alkhatib
The Petitioner, Ahmed G. Mohd Alkhatib, appeals from the Davidson County Criminal Court’s dismissal of his motion to vacate his 2006 guilty-pleaded convictions for two counts of facilitation of the delivery of marijuana, for which he received an effective eleven-month, twenty-nine-day sentence. The post-conviction court treated the motion as a petition for post-conviction relief. On appeal, the Petitioner contends that the court erred by dismissing the petition after determining it was untimely. We affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Omari Davis v. State of Tennessee
The Petitioner, Omari Davis, pled guilty to possessing heroin with intent to sell or deliver. After a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced the Petitioner as a Range II, multiple offender to serve a term of eighteen years. Thereafter, the Petitioner sought post-conviction relief, alleging that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel when his trial counsel failed to seek a competency evaluation. At the hearing, the Petitioner also argued that trial counsel was ineffective when he failed to seek a continuance of the sentencing hearing. The post-conviction court denied relief as to the competency evaluation but did not address the continuance issue. On our review, we respectfully affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Shundarius Turner
Defendant, Shundarius Turner, was convicted by a jury of reckless homicide, especially |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
William Heath v. State of Tennessee
A Shelby County Jury convicted William Heath, Petitioner, of especially aggravated robbery, aggravated assault, and reckless endangerment. On direct appeal, we affirmed the judgments of the trial court, and the Tennessee Supreme Court declined discretionary review. Petitioner then petitioned for post-conviction relief alleging trial counsel was ineffective. The post-conviction court denied the petition, and we affirmed the post-conviction court’s judgment. While Petitioner’s post-conviction petition was pending, he moved for DNA analysis and post-conviction relief. The post-conviction court denied the petition, and Petitioner now appeals. After review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Bobby Marable II
The Defendant, Bobby Marable II, was convicted by a Gibson County Circuit Court jury |
Gibson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Jennifer May Mahaffey
Defendant, Jennifer May Mahaffey, pled guilty to alternate counts of sale of |
Henderson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Hubert Glenn Sexton, Jr.
In 2000, the Scott County Grand Jury indicted the Defendant, Hubert Glenn Sexton, Jr., |
Scott | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Kinney Louis Spears
Defendant, Kinney Louis Spears, was indicted by the Houston County Grand Jury for the first degree murder of his wife, Mia Donnita Spears. The Houston County Circuit Court granted Defendant’s motion for a change of venue and transferred the case to the Dickson County Circuit Court. A Dickson County jury found Defendant guilty of the lesser-included offense of second degree murder, and the trial court sentenced Defendant to serve 25 years’ confinement. In this appeal as of right, Defendant asserts that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction, that several improper comments by the prosecutor during closing argument constitute plain error, and that his sentence is excessive. Having reviewed the entire record and the briefs of the parties, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Dickson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Douglas Edward Christian v. State of Tennessee
The Petitioner, Douglas Edward Christian, appeals from the Coffee County Circuit Court’s |
Coffee | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Jordan Isaiah Mosby
In 2013, the Defendant, Jordan Isaiah Mosby, pleaded guilty to attempted second degree |
Montgomery | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Steven Ray Crockett
The defendant, Steven Ray Crockett, appeals his Rutherford County Circuit Court jury conviction of aggravated robbery. On appeal, the defendant asserts that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction and that the trial court erred by imposing a 12-year sentence, by ordering the sentence to run consecutively to his prior felony conviction from Virginia, and by accrediting only a portion of his pretrial time served in incarceration. Because the trial court’s imposition of consecutive sentencing was superfluous and because it failed to properly accredit the defendant’s pretrial jail credits, we reverse and remand for entry of a corrected judgment on these issues. We affirm the trial court’s judgment in all other respects. |
Rutherford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Danny R. Weld-Ebanks
Defendant, Danny R. Weld-Ebanks, appeals the Davidson County Criminal Court’s revocation of judicial diversion. He argues that the trial court relied on unnoticed grounds and abused its discretion in revoking his diversion. The State concedes on both issues. We agree that the trial court abused its discretion in revoking Defendant’s diversion and therefore vacate the judgment of the trial court and remand for a new revocation hearing. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Robert James Houston
A Giles County jury convicted the Defendant, Robert James Houston, of aggravated assault and simple assault, and the trial court sentenced him to a total effective sentence of ten years of incarceration. On appeal, the Defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his convictions. After review, we affirm the trial court’s judgments. |
Giles | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Denny Kentra Reynolds
A Maury County Circuit Court jury convicted the defendant, Denny Kentra Reynolds, of possession of 26 grams or more of cocaine with the intent to sell, possession of one-half ounce to 10 pounds of marijuana with the intent to sell, and possession of drug paraphernalia. The trial court imposed an effective 12-year sentence. On appeal, the defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions, the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress, and the length of his sentence. Upon review, we affirm. |
Maury | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Terrance Reese v. Frank Strada, Warden
Terrance Reese,[1] Petitioner, appeals from the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief, in which he alleged that he received an illegal sentence, that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, and that one of his convictions was void. The habeas corpus court summarily dismissed the petition because the judgments were valid on their face and the trial court had jurisdiction over the offenses. Petitioner appeals the dismissal of the petition. We affirm the judgment of the habeas corpus court. |
Trousdale | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Billy Taylor, IV v. State of Tennessee
The Petitioner, Billy Taylor, IV, appeals the Knox County Criminal Court’s denial of his |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Brandon Vandenburg v. State of Tennessee
The Petitioner, Brandon Vandenburg, appeals from the Davidson County Criminal Court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief from his convictions for four counts of aggravated rape, one count of attempted aggravated rape, two counts of aggravated sexual battery, and one count of unlawful photography of the victim. On appeal, the Petitioner contends that the post-conviction court erred by denying relief on his claims alleging that he received ineffective assistance of counsel by (1) lead counsel’s failure to have a witness qualified as an expert psychiatrist at trial, (2) lead counsel’s failure to introduce prior bad act evidence regarding the Petitioner’s codefendants at trial, and (3) lead counsel’s failure to have the Petitioner’s voicemail to Mr. Quinzio admitted as an exhibit at trial. The Petitioner also raises freestanding post-conviction claims, arguing that the trial court violated the Petitioner’s protection against double jeopardy by (1) allowing him to be retried on amended charges after jeopardy had attached and (2) allowing the State to proceed with a superseding indictment without disposing of the original indictment. Following our review, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Mickey Edwards v. State of Tennessee
The Petitioner, Mickey Edwards, appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Eric Bledsoe
The Defendant, Eric Bledsoe, was convicted by a Shelby County Criminal Court jury of |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals |