State of Tennessee v. Dale Anthony Wilbourn
The Defendant, Dale Anthony Wilbourn, was convicted of the offenses of evading arrest |
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Courdarrius Perkins
A Shelby County jury convicted Defendant, Courdarrius Perkins, of first-degree felony |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Gregory Lavelle Lilly
The Appellant, Gregory Lavelle Lilly, appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence. Tenn. R. Crim. P. 35. Upon review of the motion filed by appointed counsel, and in light of the record on appeal, the Court hereby affirms the order of the trial court. |
Sumner | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Ladon Antoine Doak v. State of Tennessee
Petitioner, Ladon Antoine Doak, appeals the denial of his post-conviction petition, arguing that the post-conviction court erred in finding that he received the effective assistance of counsel at trial. Following our review of the entire record and the briefs of the parties, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Michael E. Odom
Defendant, Michael E. Odom, was convicted by a Houston County jury of assault and elder abuse. The trial court imposed a two-year sentence, suspended to supervised probation after sixty days of incarceration. Defendant appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for a new trial. On appeal, Defendant argues that the jury instruction on elder abuse was incomplete and that the trial court improperly commented on matters of fact during trial testimony. Following our review of the entire record, the briefs of the parties, and oral argument, we affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Houston | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Deshawn Eugene Williams
Defendant, Deshawn Eugene Williams, appeals from the Davidson County Criminal Court’s revoking his probation and ordering him to serve his previously ordered probationary sentence of ten years in confinement. On appeal, Defendant argues the trial court abused its discretion by failing to give him credit for time successfully served while on probation. After review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Charles Anderson Clark, Jr.
The pro se Petitioner, Charles Anderson Clark, Jr., appeals the denial of his motion to |
Henderson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Kyanedre Oshea-Malik Benson
The Defendant, Kyanedre Oshea-Malik Benson, was convicted in the Haywood County Circuit Court of one count of employing a firearm during the attempt to commit voluntary manslaughter, a Class C felony; one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, a Class C felony; one count of attempted voluntary manslaughter, a Class D felony; ten counts of reckless aggravated assault, a Class D felony; and one count of reckless endangerment with a deadly weapon, a Class E felony. After a sentencing hearing, he received an effective sentence of sixty-two years in confinement. On appeal, the Defendant claims that the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions of attempted voluntary manslaughter and employing a firearm during the attempt to commit voluntary manslaughter and that the trial court erred by refusing to merge one of his convictions of reckless aggravated assault into his conviction of attempted voluntary manslaughter. Upon review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Haywood | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Jerry W. Phillips v. Martin Frink, Warden
Jerry W. Phillips, Petitioner, appeals from the summary dismissal of his habeas corpus petition in which he claimed his convictions were void because there was a fatal variance between the proof at trial and the indictment and that the proof at trial, which differed from the proof at the preliminary hearing, constructively amended the indictment. After a thorough review of the record and the applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the habeas court. |
Trousdale | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Darius Henderson
In this appeal from a resentencing hearing, the Defendant, Darius Henderson, challenges |
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Michael Bailey v. State of Tennessee
Petitioner, Michael Bailey, appeals from the Shelby County Criminal Court’s summary |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Martiness Henderson v. State of Tennessee
Petitioner, Martiness Henderson, appeals from the Shelby County Criminal Court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, in which he alleged that he received the ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. Having reviewed the entire record and the briefs of the parties, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Daryl Deangelo Rollins
Defendant, Daryl Deangelo Rollins, pled guilty to one count of reckless vehicular homicide |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Courtney R. Logan v. Vincent Vantell, Warden
The Petitioner, Courtney R. Logan, appeals the Hardeman County Circuit Court’s |
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Erik Courtney Lehto, Alias
A Knox County jury convicted the defendant, Erik Courtney Lehto, of two counts of rape |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Fedtrust Federal Credit Union v. Lynnsay Brooks
This appeal concerns a circuit court's disrnissal of an appeal by a Defendant from |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Jessica R. Adkins v. State of Tennessee
The petitioner, Jessica R. Adkins, appeals the denial of her post-conviction petition, |
Court of Criminal Appeals | ||
Roger Reed v. State of Tennessee
The petitioner, Roger Reed, appeals the Shelby County Criminal Court’s denial of postconviction |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Frank Delmar Raines, Jr.
Frank Delmar Raines, Jr., Defendant, was indicted for rape, aggravated kidnapping, and |
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Tondre Durpress Ragland
A Haywood County jury convicted the defendant, Tondre Durpress Ragland, of attempted second-degree murder, possession of a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony, and aggravated assault, for which he received an effective sentence of twenty years in confinement. On appeal, the defendant contends the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his conviction for aggravated assault. The defendant also argues the trial court erred in imposing partial consecutive sentences. Following our review, we affirm the defendant’s convictions. However, we reverse the imposition of consecutive sentences and remand to the trial court for a new sentencing hearing for consideration of the consecutive sentencing factors outlined in State v. Wilkerson, 905 S.W.2d 933 (Tenn. 1995). |
Haywood | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Daryl Bobo
The defendant appeals from the Shelby County Criminal Court’s denial of his motion seeking resentencing pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-17-432(h). Upon our review of the applicable law and the briefs of the parties, we conclude the defendant does not have an appeal as of right and the instant appeal should be dismissed. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Jonathan Michael Atha v. State of Tennessee
The petitioner, Jonathan Michael Atha, appeals the denial of his motion for a hearing on |
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Cody Lynn Wyrick, Alias
The defendant, Cody Lynn Wyrick, Alias, appeals his Knox County Criminal Court jury |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Demorris Sanchez McKenzie v. State of Tennessee
Petitioner, DeMorris Sanchez McKenzie, sought relief from his convictions and effective |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Andre JuJuan Lee Green
The State appeals the trial court’s order granting the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence recovered during the search of the car in which the defendant was a passenger. The State asserts that the trial court erred because the scent of marijuana provided probable cause for the search regardless of the possibility that legal hemp was the source of the odor. After review, we conclude the trial court erred in granting the defendant’s motion to suppress. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s order granting the defendant’s motion for suppression, reinstate the indictments against the defendant, and remand to the trial court for further proceedings. |
Montgomery | Court of Criminal Appeals |