Williams vs. Sears, Roebuck
01A01-9610-CV-00488
Trial Court Judge: Marietta M. Shipley

Cashion vs. Robertson
01A01-9506-CH-00257
Trial Court Judge: C. Allen High

Utley vs. Cullum & Truck Salvage
01A01-9604-CV-00164
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

03C01-9505-CR-00144
03C01-9505-CR-00144
Trial Court Judge: Ben W. Hooper, II

03C01-9601-CR-00013
03C01-9601-CR-00013
Trial Court Judge: Stephen M. Bevil

03C01-9601-CC-00043
03C01-9601-CC-00043
Trial Court Judge: James E. Beckner

State of Tennessee v. Jimmy Cullop, Jr.
03C01-9607-CR-00281
Authoring Judge: Gary R. Wade, Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. R. Jerry Beck, Judge
The defendant, Jimmy Cullop, Jr., was convicted of possession of contraband while in jail under Tennessee Code Annotated _ 39-16-21. The trial court imposed a Range I, four-year sentence. The sentence was ordered to be served consecutively to his prior sentence.

02A01-9511-CH-00248
02A01-9511-CH-00248
Trial Court Judge: C. Neal Small

02A01-9606-CV-00145
02A01-9606-CV-00145
Trial Court Judge: George H. Brown

02a01-9510-CH-00216
02a01-9510-CH-00216
Trial Court Judge: C. Neal Small

02A01-9601-CH-00008
02A01-9601-CH-00008
Trial Court Judge: John Hill Chisolm

02C01-9512-CC-00379
02C01-9512-CC-00379
Trial Court Judge: Whit A. Lafon

03A01-9608-CV-00251
03A01-9608-CV-00251

03A01-9611-CV-00345
03A01-9611-CV-00345

03A01-9609-CH-00300
03A01-9609-CH-00300

02C01-9603-CC-00096
02C01-9603-CC-00096
Trial Court Judge: John Franklin Murchison

Part Upon State v. Roger Dale Hill, No. 01C01-9508-Cc-00267 (Tenn. Crim. App. June
02C01-9702-CC-00056

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

03C01-9511-CC-00367
03C01-9511-CC-00367
Trial Court Judge: Ben W. Hooper, II

03C01-9602-CC-00053
03C01-9602-CC-00053
Trial Court Judge: Arden L. Hill

03C01-9510-CR-00335
03C01-9510-CR-00335
Trial Court Judge: Joseph F. Dirisio

03C01-9607-CR-00281
03C01-9607-CR-00281
Trial Court Judge: R. Jerry Beck

03C01-9607-CC-00261
03C01-9607-CC-00261
Trial Court Judge: Stephen M. Bevil

David B. Mase v. Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc.
03S01-9605-CV-00054
Authoring Judge: Roger E. Thayer, Special Judge
Trial Court Judge: Hon. Dale C. Workman,
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. Defendant, Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc., has appealed from the trial court's action in awarding plaintiff, David B. Mase, 35% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. The employer contends the trial court was in error in ruling it liable for the compensable injury as opposed to applying the Last Injury Rule, which would have fixed liability against the employee's last employer. An issue is also raised as to whether the trial court was in error in awarding an amount of disability which was in excess of 2_ times the medical impairment rating. Plaintiff was 3 years of age at the time of the trial and had completed the 12th grade. He testified he was injured while working on October 15, 1993, when he was stacking twelve-pack cartons of drinks at a customer's business; that he experienced pain in his left hip and leg; he was referred by his employer to Dr. Don King, who treated him with medication and therapy; he was released to return to work on November 12, 1993, and returned to the same job at the same rate of pay; he told the trial court he did not feel able to work but attempted to do so anyway. Plaintiff was terminated by defendant on December 2, 1993. There is a conflict in the evidence as to the exact reason for his discharge. Plaintiff testified a supervisor requested that he sign a written statement agreeing he could be terminated if he did not meet certain standards of work; that he told the company official that he would not sign the statement because his physical condition would not permit him to comply with the statements and that he was terminated for failing to execute the statement. The record indicates that during 1992 and 1993 plaintiff had been warned a number of times by his employer that his performance on the job was not satisfactory and that he had been tardy in reporting to work often. 2