Ray Edwards vs. Hallsdale-Powell Utility District E2002-00395-COA-R9-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Wheeler A. Rosenbalm
This is an appeal from the grant of partial summary judgment for defendant that plaintiff could not maintain an action for inverse condemnation. On appeal, we vacate the grant of summary judgment.
Knox
Court of Appeals
State Dept of Children's Srvcs vs. B.J.A.L. E2002-00292-COA-R3-JV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Shirley B. Underwood
The trial court terminated the parental rights of B.J.A.L. ("Mother") with respect to her minor female child, R.A.A. (DOB: September 15, 1989). Mother appeals, arguing, among other things, that the evidence preponderates against the trial court's determination that there is clear and convincing evidence to terminate her parental rights. We affirm.
Court of Appeals
Nikki Bowie vs. Richard Bowie E2001-02923-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: John F. Weaver
Richard Roy Bowie ("Husband") and Nikki Lynn Herrington Bowie ("Wife") were divorced in 2000. Wife was awarded sole custody of the couple's young child. Husband was granted visitation pursuant to a custody agreement filed March 1, 2000. The Trial Court found that Wife's monthly need was $7,200, but that Husband was unable to pay this amount. The Trial Court awarded Wife monthly child support in the amount of $1,057, and alimony in futuro of $1,500 per month. Husband appeals the type of alimony awarded to the Wife, the Trial Court's finding regarding the amount of Wife's monthly need, and the amount of alimony awarded. Wife raises an additional issue regarding whether the Trial Court erred in not awarding her attorney's fees. We affirm.
Knox
Court of Appeals
Betty Black & Barry Goins vs. State Farm Mutual E2002-00206-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: John K. Byers
In action for breach of insurance contract, the Trial Court granted Summary Judgment on the ground insurance company had properly satisfied all claims under plaintiffs' policies. Plaintiffs have appealed. We affirm.
Washington
Court of Appeals
AAron Del Shannon vs. Darla Shannon E2002-00518-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Michael A. Davis
In this post-divorce case, Aaron Del Shannon ("Father") filed a petition against his former wife, Darla Jean Shannon ("Mother"), seeking to modify the parties' divorce judgment, which judgment, inter alia, had awarded Mother custody of the parties' two minor children. In his petition, Father sought a change of custody and asked to be named primary residential parent of the children. The trial court found a substantial and material change of circumstances and granted Father's petition. We reverse.
Frank White & Sue White vs. Gerald Jenkins E2002-00275-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
The Trial Court awarded landlord a judgment against tenant for possession, rent owing, and attorney fees. On appeal, we affirm with modifications.
Blount
Court of Appeals
Kimberly Lewis vs. Timothy Lewis E2002-00209-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: G. Richard Johnson
In this divorce case, Timothy E. Lewis ("Husband") appeals the Trial Court's decision, arguing that it erred in classifying certain assets as marital rather than his separate property. Husband asserts that "the failure of the Trial Court to properly characterize separate property versus marital property [resulted in] an inequitable division of the parties' assets." We find that several of the assets classified by the Trial Court as marital property should have been classified as Husband's separate property. We also find that a portion of the Husband's credit card debt, which was incurred during the marriage, should be assigned to Kimberly G. Harmon ("Wife"). We affirm the Trial Court's judgment in all other respects.
Johnson
Court of Appeals
Patricia Ridgeway vs. Jimmy Kimball E2001-02577-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: Daryl R. Fansler
The sole issue for our review in this divorce case is whether the Chancellor erred in ordering the Appellant, Jimmy Clarke Kimball ("Husband") to pay alimony in futuro in the amount of $1,000 per month to the Appellee, Patricia Anne Ridgeway ("Wife"). We find that the Chancellor properly considered the applicable statutory factors and that the evidence does not preponderate against his decision to award alimony in futuro rather than rehabilitative alimony. Consequently, we affirm the Chancellor's judgment.
Knox
Court of Appeals
Lassie Frazier vs. Brock's Open Air Market E2002-00203-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: Richard R. Vance
Clifford Frazier and Azeline Kittrell were sitting on a bench located in front of Brock's Open Air Market. Catherine Ottinger ("Ottinger"), who already had consumed six beers, was at the store to purchase a salad and more beer. As Ottinger was leaving, her car, for whatever reason, accelerated rapidly while in reverse and made a U-turn at a high rate of speed. While in reverse, Ottinger drove onto a public road and then came back onto the store's premises, jumped a concrete curb and hit Clifford Frazier and Azeline Kittrell, who later died from their injuries. Plaintiffs sued Brock's Open Air Market asserting, as relevant to this appeal, premises liability. The Trial Court granted summary judgment to Brock's Open Air Market on the basis that the accident in question was not reasonably foreseeable. We affirm.
Cocke
Court of Appeals
Gale Emerson vs. Robert Emerson E2001-02835-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: W. Neil Thomas, III
In this post-divorce action, the Trial Court ordered an increase in child support and ordered the father to pay 85% of the son's private school tuition. On appeal, the father insists the Trial Court was without jurisdiction to entertain the petition, and the proof did not support the increases ordered by the Trial Court. We affirm.
Hamilton
Court of Appeals
Sandor Turucz vs. Betty T. Madewell E2001-03134-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: L. Marie Williams
Sandor Turucz sued Betty T. Madewell seeking to recover for personal injuries and property damage sustained by him in a two-vehicle accident in Hamilton County. The case was tried to a jury, who found both parties 50% at fault. The trial court entered its judgment decreeing that "the plaintiff shall have and recover nothing from the defendant." The plaintiff appeals, arguing that errors were made by the trial court in its charge to the jury and that the verdict of the jury is not supported by material evidence. We affirm.
Hamilton
Court of Appeals
Mary Varner vs. Jason Varner E2001-02917-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: L. Marie Williams
In divorce case the Trial Court divided marital property and debts, awarded alimony and designated debts to be paid by husband as alimony. On appeal, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
Hamilton
Court of Appeals
Phillip Jessee vs. American General Life E2002-00182-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
In this case of alleged age discrimination case from the Chancery Court for Sullivan County the Plaintiffs/Appellants, Phillip Jessee and James O. Morse, argue that the Trial Court erred in refusing to grant their request for a continuance, in its admission and exclusion of certain evidence and in its dismissal of their cause of action against the Defendant/Appellee, American General Life and Accident Insurance Company. We affirm the judgment of the Trial Court.
Sullivan
Court of Appeals
Christopher Hooven v. Johnnia Hooven M2001-02108-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Stella L. Hargrove
The wife appeals from the Trial Court's placing primary custody of the parties' minor children with the father. We affirm.
Giles
Court of Appeals
Julia Wilkes v. Fred's, Inc. W2001-02393-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Robert A. Lanier
Plaintiff slipped and fell on liquid laundry detergent which had spilled in the customer service area in Defendant's store. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the Defendant. We affirm
Shelby
Court of Appeals
Julia Wilkes v. Fred's, Inc. W2001-02393-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer
Trial Court Judge: Robert A. Lanier
Plaintiff slipped and fell on liquid laundry detergent which had spilled in the customer service area in Defendant's store. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the Defendant. We affirm
Shelby
Court of Appeals
Smith, Deceased v. Jerry Smith E2001-03132-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney
Trial Court Judge: Thomas R. Frierson, II
Hamblen
Court of Appeals
Phillip Burdett vs. Kathy Burdett E2002-01071-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Lawrence H. Puckett
In this divorce action, the issue is whether the division of marital property by the Trial Court is equitable. We affirm.
Joseph Bolinger vs. Sharon Ann Bolinger E2002-00103-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: Conrad E. Troutman, Jr.
In this divorce case, the sole issue for our review is whether the Trial Court properly classified three IRAs held by Joseph D. Bolinger ("Husband") as partially marital and partially separate assets. Applying the analysis set forth by the Supreme Court in the case of Langschmidt v. Langschmidt, 81 S.W.3d 741 (Tenn. 2002), we hold that the IRAs, which were funded with premarital assets, should be classified as Husband's separate property. We therefore vacate the Trial Court's judgment that the IRAs are partially marital assets and remand this case.
Campbell
Court of Appeals
Wallace Forsythe v. Timothy Gibbs M2001-02055-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Barbara N. Haynes
A laborer injured on the job during horseplay initiated by his employer claimed that he was entitled to damages in tort for his employer's actions. The trial court dismissed the suit, ruling that the plaintiff was bound by the exclusive remedy provisions of the Workers' Compensation Statute. We affirm.
