State of Tenessee o/b/o Carol A. Vaughn v. Peter Kaatrude - Concurring
This appeal involves a father’s obligation to pay support for a non-marital child. Fifteen years after the child’s birth, the Tennessee Department of Human Services, acting on behalf of the child’s mother, filed suit in the Montgomery County Juvenile Court seeking to establish paternity and to obtain past and future support from the father. Following a bench trial, the trial court entered an order establishing paternity and ordering the father to pay $542.50 per month in child support. The juvenile court also awarded the mother $50,000 in back child support. The father now takes issue with the amount of the award for back child support. We have concluded that the evidence does not support the amount of the award for back child support and accordingly remand the case for further proceedings. |
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Carl Scott and Alma Scott, v. Rogers Group, Inc.
This is a case involving breach of contract. Plaintiffs/appellants, Carl Scott and Alma Scott (referred to herein as “the Scotts”) appeal from the order of the trial court granting summary judgment to defendant/appellee, Rogers Group, Inc. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Barry Stokes and Pamela Stokes v. Torina Arnold
The Chancery Court for Dickson County terminated a mother’s parental rights to three young children and allowed the foster parents to proceed with the adoption of the children. Because we find that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence upon which to base the termination of the mother’s parental rights, we reverse. |
Dickson | Court of Appeals | |
Steven B. Dargi and Andrea L. Dargi v. The Terminix International Company, State of Tennessee, et al. - Concurring
The plaintiff repeatedly cursed and insulted the defendant’s attorney during a taped deposition. The attorney played portions of the tape during the trial. The trial court found that the plaintiff’s utterances constituted criminal contempt. We affirm. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
In the Matter of: K.E.C.D., a child Under the Age of 18 Years
This appeal involves a dispute over the surname of a child born to unmarried parents. The biological father (“Father”) of the minor child, seeks reversal of the juvenile court’s denial of his motion to change the child’s last name. Over the objections of the mother (“Mother”),1 Father sought to change his son’s last name to his own to reflect his paternity. For the following reasons, we vacate and remand.2 |
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Ferris E. Watson v. Lynn Rose Watson
This case involves a dispute over custody of two children upon their parents’ divorce. The trial court awarded custody to Lynn Rose Watson (“Mother”) with visitation to Ferris E. Watson (“Father”). Father appeals, claiming he is comparatively the better parent. We affirm the award of custody to Mother. |
Stewart | Court of Appeals | |
Robert Bean, Franklin Shaffer, David Autry, Mack Roberts, v. Ned Ray McWherter, Governor of the State of Tennessee, et al.
The appellants have asked the court to rehear this appeal because we did not address the facial conflict between the definitions of Class II and Class III wildlife, leaving the public without any guidance as to what species are in Class II. Since the possession of Class II wildlife without a permit is a crime, and no permit is required for the possession of those species in Class III, the determination of what is included in Class II is the critical determination. And a person of ordinary intelligence must be able to make it. State v. Thomas, 635 S.W.2d 114 (Tenn. 1982). |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Rutherford Co. Bd. of Ed. vs. Rutherford Co. Comm.
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-02098-C)A-R3-CV
|
Hawkins | Court of Appeals | |
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance vs. Brian Howard, et al
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-02550-COA-R3-CV
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
02525-COA-R3-CV
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
00747-COA-R3-CV
|
Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
Jeffrey L. Lawson v. University of Tennessee
We granted this Rule 9, T.R.A.P., application to determine whether the defendant University of Tennessee (“the University”) can be sued for a violation of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. We find that it cannot be sued for such violations under the current state of the law. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order denying the University’s motion to dismiss. |
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-02516-COA-R9-CV
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-02518-COA-R3-CV
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
William George Baltrip vs. Roy K. Norris, et al . Carolyn Turner vs. Monroe Farmers Cooperative
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
E1998-00745-COA-R3-CV
|
Claiborne | Court of Appeals | |
Advantage Funding Corp. vs. Mid-TN Manufacturing Co.
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Lineberry vs. Ashe
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
Baker, et al vs. American Paper and Twine Co.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Woodridge Properties vs. Franco-Ward
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
West vs. West
|
Warren | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-02263-COA-R3-CV
|
Hamblen | Court of Appeals | |
In This Action F Or Damag Es For Injuries Sustained In a Motor Ve Hicle
|
Court of Appeals |