COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS

The Nam Es of The Hu Sband An D Wife. Th E Parties Also a Cquired Va Rious Hous Ehold
E1999-01326-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks

Court of Appeals

E1999-00014-COA-R3-CV
E1999-00014-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks

Court of Appeals

E1998-00349-COA-R3-CV
E1998-00349-COA-R3-CV

Court of Appeals

E1999-00380-COA-R3-
E1999-00380-COA-R3-

Court of Appeals

Tommy Lee White vs. Caroldene White
E1998-00664-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks

Court of Appeals

02296-COA-R3-CV
02296-COA-R3-CV

Sevier Court of Appeals

03A01-9902-CV-00056
03A01-9902-CV-00056

Court of Appeals

03A01-9903-GS-00083
03A01-9903-GS-00083

Blount Court of Appeals

Public Employees vs. Alana Parminter
W2000-01540-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: D. J. Alissandratos
Administrator of employee's deferred income plan filed a complaint for a declaratory judgment seeking a determination of the proper beneficiary, either employee's widow or employee's sister entitled to the funds after the employee's death. The dispute basically involves an interpretation of the plan terms dealing with the method of changing beneficiaries. The trial court awarded the funds to employee's widow; an employee's sister has appealed. We vacate and remand.

Shelby Court of Appeals

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

Court of Appeals

E1999-02285-COA-R3-CV
E1999-02285-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney

Hamilton Court of Appeals

E1999-01308-COA-R3-CV
E1999-01308-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard

Scott Court of Appeals

James R. Golden vs. Holly N. Hood (Black)
E1999-02443-COA-MR3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks

Court of Appeals

E1999-02427-COA-R3-CV
E1999-02427-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.

Anderson Court of Appeals

E1999-02474-COA-R3-CV
E1999-02474-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge David Michael Swiney

Sullivan Court of Appeals

03A01-9808-CV-00282
03A01-9808-CV-00282

Hamilton Court of Appeals

Sandra Silverstein vs. William Rice
W1999-01336-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Trial Court Judge: George R. Ellis
This is a suit to enforce a past child support obligation. The mother filed suit against the father, seeking past due child support payments, health insurance premiums and medical costs for the parties' three minor children. The trial court held for the mother, and granted her a judgment for the child support arrearages, health insurance and medical costs, attorney's fees and pre-judgment interest on the child support arrearages. The father appeals, arguing, inter alia, that the trial court erred by failing to prorate his child support obligation as each child attained majority. We affirm, holding that the trial court was not required to prorate the child support obligation as each child attained majority, because the child support award was a lump sum for all of the children and the amount was below the guideline amount for the remaining minor children.

Madison Court of Appeals

1999-00399-COA-R9-CV
1999-00399-COA-R9-CV

Sullivan Court of Appeals

E1999-00892-COA-
E1999-00892-COA-

Court of Appeals

Strzelecki vs. McGriff
M1999-00057-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson

Davidson Court of Appeals

Swanson vs. Peterson
M1999-00241-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz

Davidson Court of Appeals

00585-COA-R3-CV
00585-COA-R3-CV
Trial Court Judge: Vernon Neal

Pickett Court of Appeals

01250-COA-R3-CV
01250-COA-R3-CV
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

Davidson Court of Appeals

Ronald M. Guy v. Mutual of Omaha Insurance Company
W1999-00942--COA-R9-CV
Trial Court Judge: Karen R. Williams

Shelby Court of Appeals

Estate of W.O. McIntyre
W1999-01700-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Trial Court Judge: Dewey C. Whitenton
This is a will contest. The decedent committed suicide after writing several notes in which he expressed his wish that the bulk of his estate pass to his wife of eighteen years, with specific bequests to his children. The decedent's children contested the validity of the disposition, arguing that the decedent lacked testamentary capacity to execute a will at the time that he wrote the notes. After a jury trial, the jury found that the decedent had testamentary capacity and that the handwritten notes constituted a valid holographic will. The children appeal, arguing that the burden of proving testamentary capacity should have been placed on the will's proponents, due to the decedent's depression and resulting suicide, and that the evidence did not support the jury's verdict. We affirm, finding that the trial court did not err in its instructions on the burden of proof and that there is material evidence to support the jury's verdict.

McNairy Court of Appeals