Wilson vs. Mcwherter
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Inr re: Banks Dewey Thompson
|
Grundy | Court of Appeals | |
DHS vs. Rudd
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Hall vs. Pippin & Delaney
|
Putnam | Court of Appeals | |
Hall vs. Pippin & Delaney
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Johnson vs. Dept. of Corrections
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
In the matter of: Laura Ann Campbell
|
Perry | Court of Appeals | |
Seffernick vs. St. Thomas Hospital
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Vickie Lewis v. Otis Campbell & Robert Dinwiddie
|
Warren | Court of Appeals | |
James Carroll vs. Carolyn Whitney
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Miller vs. Miller
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Peggy Arnold vs. Dehoney Inter.
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Stroud vs. Seaton
|
Anderson | Court of Appeals | |
Godwin Aircraft vs. Wayne Walker
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Charles Haynes vs. Robert Conley
|
Lauderdale | Court of Appeals | |
Brown vs. McMullin, et. al.
|
Lawrence | Court of Appeals | |
Donegan vs. Donegan
|
Dickson | Court of Appeals | |
Gleaves vs. Checker Cab Transit & Mosley
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Scott Grahm Hartman, Kay Hartman, his mother and duly qualified conservator and guardian, and Cleon Hartman, v. The University of Tennessee, State of Tennessee, et. al .
The captioned claimants have appealed from the decision of the Tennessee Claims Commission denying their claim against the State and the University of Tennessee for the catastrophic injury of a student athlete while engaged in athletic activity. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Scott Graham Hartman, Kay Hartment, his mother and duly qualified conservator and guardian, and Cleon Hartman, v. The University of Tennessee, and The State of Tennessee
The captioned claimants have appealed from the decision of the Tennessee Claims Commission denying their claim against the State and the University of Tennessee for the catastrophic injury of a student athlete while engaged in athletic activity. |
Court of Appeals | ||
Keown vs. Fiddler's Inn, d/b/a: Fiddler's Inn North
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Dorothy Ahern vs. Robert Ahern
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Margaret Haas vs. Michael Haas
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Fred E. Dean v. Donal Campbell, et al.
This case comes to us on appeal from an order dismissing Appellant Dean’s complaint against Appellees, filed apparently under the auspices of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 et seq., alleging violation of civil rights under the color of state authority. The trial court dismissed Mr. Dean’s complaint for failure to specify the capacity of the defendants being sued. For the reasons and under the authorities recited below, we affirm the trial court’s dismissal of Mr. Dean’s claim with prejudice. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Marlon Madison -Concurring
The Juvenile Court of Pickett County found a juvenile to be delinquent for selling marijuana to a classmate. He appealed to the Circuit Court, which likewise found him to be delinquent, and placed him on probation with the Department of Childrens’ Services. We reverse the Circuit Court. |
Pickett | Court of Appeals |