Cindy Stubbs vs. Woodrow Stubbs
|
Obion | Court of Appeals | |
Deborah Plunk vs. Edward Plunk
|
Chester | Court of Appeals | |
Walter Biddle vs. Norfolk Southern Corp. et al
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
In re: Jeffrey Morgan
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
City of Athens vs. Callaway
|
McMinn | Court of Appeals | |
Burnett vs. Hamby
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Young vs. Young
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Geraldo vs. Vanderbilt University
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Easterly vs. Harmon
|
Sequatchie | Court of Appeals | |
Lemasters vs. Ross
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Ames vs. Phillips Builders
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
In re: Estate of Alla Mae Locke Simmons, Deceased
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Frazier vs. George
|
Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
Alexander Friedmann, v. Charles Bass, et al.
This appeal involves a prison disciplinary proceeding. After being found guilty of engaging in an unauthorized monetary transaction, the prisoner filed a petition for common-law writ of certiorari in the Chancery Court for Davidson County alleging that the disciplinary proceeding violated his due process rights. The trial court granted the prison officials’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the petition on the ground that the petitioner had failed to make out a due process claim as a matter of law. We affirm the summary judgment in accordance with Tenn. Ct. App. R. 10(b).1 |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Friedmann vs. Bass
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Zanetis vs. McMackin
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Zanetis vs. McMackin
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Ringling vs. TN. Bd. of Paroles
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Nilsen vs. Black
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Bellsouth Telecommunications vs. TN. Regulatory Authority
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Phelps vs. The TN. Bd. of Paroles
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Phelps vs. The TN. Bd. of Paroles
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Mitchell vs. Reno
|
Cannon | Court of Appeals | |
Michael Sanderson v. University of Tennessee - Concurring
In this case, a student at the University of Tennessee was charged with plagiarism. After a hearing, an administrative law judge found that the student had not committed plagiarism. The University Chancellor reversed the ALJ’s decision, issuing a final order finding the student guilty of plagiarism. The student appealed this decision to the chancery court, pursuant to the Tennessee Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, which affirmed the finding of plagiarism. We affirm the decision of the chancery court. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Charles Fossett vs. State of TN
|
Court of Appeals |