COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS

Cindy Stubbs vs. Woodrow Stubbs
02A01-9703-CH-00050
Trial Court Judge: William Michael Maloan

Obion Court of Appeals

Deborah Plunk vs. Edward Plunk
02A01-9702-CH-00040
Trial Court Judge: Joe C. Morris

Chester Court of Appeals

Walter Biddle vs. Norfolk Southern Corp. et al
02A01-9605-CV-00122
Trial Court Judge: D'Army Bailey

Shelby Court of Appeals

In re: Jeffrey Morgan
02A01-9608-CH-00206
Trial Court Judge: D. J. Alissandratos

Shelby Court of Appeals

City of Athens vs. Callaway
03A01-9707-CV-00256

McMinn Court of Appeals

Burnett vs. Hamby
01A01-9610-CH-00452
Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Corlew, III

Rutherford Court of Appeals

Young vs. Young
01A01-9610-CH-00473

Court of Appeals

Geraldo vs. Vanderbilt University
01A01-9610-CH-00467
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle

Davidson Court of Appeals

Easterly vs. Harmon
01A01-9609-CH-00446
Trial Court Judge: Jeffrey F. Stewart

Sequatchie Court of Appeals

Lemasters vs. Ross
01A01-9702-CV-00070
Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson

Davidson Court of Appeals

Ames vs. Phillips Builders
01A01-9701-CV-00043
Trial Court Judge: Barbara N. Haynes

Davidson Court of Appeals

In re: Estate of Alla Mae Locke Simmons, Deceased
01A01-9608-PB-00366
Trial Court Judge: Frank G. Clement, Jr.

Davidson Court of Appeals

Frazier vs. George
01A01-9703-CV-00110
Trial Court Judge: John W. Rollins

Coffee Court of Appeals

Alexander Friedmann, v. Charles Bass, et al.
01A01-9707-CH-00331
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Ellen Hobbs Lyle

This appeal involves a prison disciplinary proceeding. After being found guilty of engaging in an unauthorized monetary transaction, the prisoner filed a petition for common-law writ of certiorari in the Chancery Court for Davidson County alleging that the disciplinary proceeding violated his due process rights. The trial court granted the prison officials’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the petition on the ground that the petitioner had failed to make out a due process claim as a matter of law. We affirm the summary judgment in accordance with Tenn. Ct. App. R. 10(b).1

Davidson Court of Appeals

Friedmann vs. Bass
01A01-9707-CH-00331
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle

Davidson Court of Appeals

Zanetis vs. McMackin
01A01-9705-CV-00203
Trial Court Judge: Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr.

Court of Appeals

Zanetis vs. McMackin
01A01-9705-CV-00203
Trial Court Judge: William C. Koch

Court of Appeals

Ringling vs. TN. Bd. of Paroles
01A01-9708-CV-00416
Trial Court Judge: Thomas W. Brothers

Davidson Court of Appeals

Nilsen vs. Black
01A01-9705-CH-00212
Trial Court Judge: Alex W. Darnell

Montgomery Court of Appeals

Bellsouth Telecommunications vs. TN. Regulatory Authority
01A01-9601-BC-00008

Court of Appeals

Phelps vs. The TN. Bd. of Paroles
01A01-9603-CH-00103
Trial Court Judge: Henry F. Todd

Court of Appeals

Phelps vs. The TN. Bd. of Paroles
01A01-9603-CH-00103
Trial Court Judge: Robert S. Brandt

Davidson Court of Appeals

Mitchell vs. Reno
01A01-9605-CV-00226
Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Corlew, III

Cannon Court of Appeals

Michael Sanderson v. University of Tennessee - Concurring
01A01-9607-CH-00289
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly Kirby Lillard
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Robert S. Brandt

In this case, a student at the University of Tennessee was charged with plagiarism. After a hearing, an administrative law judge found that the  student had not committed plagiarism. The University Chancellor reversed the ALJ’s decision, issuing a final order finding the student guilty of plagiarism. The student appealed this decision to the chancery court, pursuant to the Tennessee Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, which affirmed the finding of plagiarism. We affirm the decision of the chancery court.

Davidson Court of Appeals

Charles Fossett vs. State of TN
02A01-9703-BC-00061

Court of Appeals