Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

COURT

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Sort by

Order

Estate of Bonnie Spalding 02A01-9807-PB-00183 Trial Court Judge: Robert S. Benham	Shelby	Court of Appeals	05/24/99
Marcus vs. Marcus 02S01-9804-CH-00036	Shelby	Supreme Court	05/24/99
Marcus vs. Marcus 02S01-9804-CH-00036	Shelby	Court of Appeals	05/24/99
State vs. Rogers 02S01-9804-CR-00035		Supreme Court	05/24/99
Brooks vs. Carter 02S01-9903-CV-00023	Shelby	Supreme Court	05/24/99
Sanjurjo et al vs. Woods 03S01-9901-CH-00001		Supreme Court	05/24/99
State vs. Walter Wilson W2001-01463-CCA-R3-CD Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr. Trial Court Judge: Joseph B. Dailey Walter Wilson, the defendant, was convicted of second-degree murder, felony murder, and attempted especially aggravated robbery by a Shelby County jury. The jury sentenced the defendant to life without the possibility of parole for the felony-murder conviction, and the trial court imposed a consecutive, ten-year sentence in the Department of Correction for the attempted especially aggravated robbery. On appeal, the defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions, that applicable lesser-included offenses were not charged to the jury, and that consecutive sentencing is inappropriate because he is not a dangerous offender. We affirm the attempted especially aggravated robbery conviction, but we reverse and remand for a new trial on the homicide counts based on the failure to instruct on lesser-included offenses.	Shelby	Court of Criminal Appeals	05/22/99
Stanley Powell vs. State 01C01-9804-CC-00169 Trial Court Judge: William B. Cain	Giles	Court of Criminal Appeals	05/21/99
Nancy Knight vs. Henry Knight 02A01-9804-CH-00094	Carroll	Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Krista Miller vs. Frederick Miller 02A01-9809-CH-00271 Trial Court Judge: John Walton West	Henry	Court of Appeals	05/21/99
State vs. George Matthews 01C01-9805-CR-00234 Trial Court Judge: Jane W. Wheatcraft	Sumner	Court of Criminal Appeals	05/21/99
State vs. Mason Thomas Wilbanks and Steve A. Williams 01C01-9804-CR-00184 Trial Court Judge: Jane W. Wheatcraft	Sumner	Court of Criminal Appeals	05/21/99
Pait vs. City of Gatlinburg 03A01-9808-CH-00274		Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Harjes vs. Russell 03A01-9810-CH-00321	Hamilton	Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Debyl vs. Graham 03A01-9901-GS-00015		Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Creswell vs. Creswell 03A01-9804-CH-00151		Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Harvey vs. Ford Motor Credit 03A01-9807-CV-00235		Court of Appeals	05/21/99
) Hon. F Rank v. Will Iams, Iii 03101-9807-CH-00239		Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Haynes vs. Harris 01A01-9810-CV-00518	Hickman	Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Ausbrooks vs. Ausbrooks 01A01-9803-CH-00114 Trial Court Judge: Henry Denmark Bell	Williamson	Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Winfree vs. Winfree 01A01-9805-CH-00264 Trial Court Judge: Charles D. Haston, Sr.	Warren	Court of Appeals	05/21/99
Farrar vs. Segroves 01A01-9808-CH-00443 Trial Court Judge: Tyrus H. Cobb	Bedford	Court of Appeals	05/21/99
State vs. Frankie Lee Lunsford 03C01-9804-CR-00152 Trial Court Judge: R. Jerry Beck	Sullivan	Court of Criminal Appeals	05/21/99
State vs. Richard M. & Edith L. Parrott 03C01-9709-CR-00408 Trial Court Judge: Edgar P. Calhoun	Sullivan	Court of Criminal Appeals	05/21/99
Carden v. Roane Co. 03S01-9712-CH-00151 Authoring Judge: William H. Inman, Senior Judge Trial Court Judge: Hon. Frank V. Williams, III, This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The plaintiff was injured in July 1993 while driving a truck during the course and within the scope of his job. The occurrence of the accident is not questioned; neither does the defendant question that the plaintiff suffered a back injury as a result of the accident. The plaintiff continued his employment with intermittent medical treatment for his back complaints. On September 1, 1995, at his residence, he stooped to pick up an object and suffered another onset of pain. The complaint was filed November 2, 1995, alleging the occurrence of the traffic accident (as a result of which periodic payments of compensation were made to the plaintiff through November 15, 1995), and subsequent physical impairment. The thrust of the defense is directed to the incident of September 3, 1995, when the plaintiff allegedly suffered the non-job-related accident at home, from which his present impairment is derived. The Chancellor found a 4 percent impairment, holding that the incident at his residence was not an intervening cause, but was merely a manifestation of problems which began in 1993. The issue is whether the evidence preponderates against the finding of the Chancellor.1 1The appellant states that the Chancellor found that "the injury sustained by the plaintiff while working at home in 1995 was causally related to a work-related injury the plaintiff had suffered two years previously." As observed, the Chancellor referred to the September 1995 event as a non-intervening incident which was merely a natural progression of the plaintiff's back problems. 2	Knox	Workers Compensation Panel	05/20/99